<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Alison Cooke on Ariadne</title>
    <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/authors/alison-cooke/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Alison Cooke on Ariadne</description>
    <generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator>
    <language>en-gb</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 18 May 1997 23:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    
	<atom:link href="http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/authors/alison-cooke/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    
    
    <item>
      <title>Never Mind the Quality, Check the Badge-Width!</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/9/quality-ratings/</link>
      <pubDate>Sun, 18 May 1997 23:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/9/quality-ratings/</guid>
      <description>How does the World Health Organization rate compared to Medical Students for Choice (a reproductive health rights group)? How do the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention score across a range of review services? As commentators begin to question the value of much of the information currently available on the Internet, how helpful are stars, badges or seals of approval (SOAPs) in identifying quality resources? Is a &#34;Cool site of the moment&#34;</description>
    </item>
    
  </channel>
</rss>