<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Dana Mckay on Ariadne</title>
    <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/authors/dana-mckay/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Dana Mckay on Ariadne</description>
    <generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator>
    <language>en-gb</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Jul 2007 23:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    
	<atom:link href="http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/authors/dana-mckay/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    
    
    <item>
      <title>Institutional Repositories and Their &#39;Other&#39; Users: Usability Beyond Authors</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/52/mckay/</link>
      <pubDate>Sun, 29 Jul 2007 23:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/52/mckay/</guid>
      <description>If institutional repositories (IRs) were all that their proponents could have hoped, they would be providing researchers with better access to research, improving institutional prestige, and assisting with formal research assessment [1][2][3]. The reality, though, is that IRs are less frequently implemented, harder to fill, and less visible than their advocates would hope or expect [4][5][6].
While technical platforms for IRs, such as DSpace [7] and ePrints [8] have seen an abundance of research, little is known about the users of IRs, neither how they use IR software, nor how usable it is for them.</description>
    </item>
    
  </channel>
</rss>