<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Dominik Lukes on Ariadne</title>
    <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/authors/dominik-lukes/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Dominik Lukes on Ariadne</description>
    <generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator>
    <language>en-gb</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Jul 2013 23:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    
	<atom:link href="http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/authors/dominik-lukes/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    
    
    <item>
      <title>Bring Your Own Policy: Why Accessibility Standards Need to Be Contextually Sensitive</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/71/kelly-et-al/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jul 2013 23:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/71/kelly-et-al/</guid>
      <description>Initiatives to enhance Web accessibility have previously focused on the development of guidelines which apply on a global basis. Legislation at national and international levels increasingly mandate conformance with such guidelines. However large scale surveys have demonstrated the failure of such approaches to produce any significant impact.
We review previous critiques of the limitations of such approaches and introduces a new scenario – content for people with learning disabilities – in order to illustrate the limitations of resource-based standards.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>&#39;Does He Take Sugar?&#39;: The Risks of Standardising Easy-to-read Language</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/70/kelly-et-al/</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/70/kelly-et-al/</guid>
      <description>The idea that if we could only improve how we communicate, there would be less misunderstanding among people is as old as the hills. Historically, this notion has been expressed through things like school reform, spelling reform, publication of communication manuals, etc. The most radical expression of the desire for better understanding is the invention of a whole new artificial language with the intention of providing a universal language for humanity.</description>
    </item>
    
  </channel>
</rss>