<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Ingrid Mason on Ariadne</title>
    <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/authors/ingrid-mason/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Ingrid Mason on Ariadne</description>
    <generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator>
    <language>en-gb</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2006 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    
	<atom:link href="http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/authors/ingrid-mason/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    
    
    <item>
      <title>Book Review: Memory Bytes - History, Technology, and Digital Culture</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/46/mason-rvw/</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2006 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/46/mason-rvw/</guid>
      <description>It seemed a good idea to look at the definition of &#39;digital culture&#39; offered in Wikipedia [1] and consider this alongside the ideas presented in this text. The definition was marked for possible deletion, then, a few days later the definition had changed, and the matter seems settled (for the moment) [2].
Somewhat serendipitously the Wikipedia definition had moved from two broad expressions of &#39;digital culture&#39; that arises from the use of digital technologies, to one that refers to it as a discrete field of study that examines the effect on people.</description>
    </item>
    
  </channel>
</rss>