<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Karen Coyle on Ariadne</title>
    <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/authors/karen-coyle/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Karen Coyle on Ariadne</description>
    <generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator>
    <language>en-gb</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2004 23:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    
	<atom:link href="http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/authors/karen-coyle/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    
    
    <item>
      <title>Rights Management and Digital Library Requirements</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/40/coyle/</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2004 23:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/40/coyle/</guid>
      <description>It is common to hear members of the digital library community debating the relative merits of the two most common rights expression languages (RELs) - the Open Digital Rights Language (ODRL) and the rights language developed for the Motion Picture Expert Group (MPEG) and recently adopted by the International Organization for Standardization [1] - and which is preferable for digital library systems. Such debates are, in my opinion, premature and should be postponed until this community has developed a clear set of requirements for rights management in its environment, including rights expression, the encoding of license terms, and file protection.</description>
    </item>
    
  </channel>
</rss>