<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Katrina Clifford on Ariadne</title>
    <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/authors/katrina-clifford/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Katrina Clifford on Ariadne</description>
    <generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator>
    <language>en-gb</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 30 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    
	<atom:link href="http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/authors/katrina-clifford/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    
    
    <item>
      <title>Book Review: Introducing RDA</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/66/clifford-rvw/</link>
      <pubDate>Sun, 30 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/66/clifford-rvw/</guid>
      <description>The world of information description and retrieval is one of constant change and RDA (Resource Description and Access) is often touted as being one of the most radical changes on the horizon. Early discussions were often couched very much in terms of the principles behind the move from AACR2 (Anglo American Cataloguing Rules) and the principles of a FRBR (Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records)-based system. We gradually move closer to the Library of Congress&amp;rsquo; decision on whether to adopt RDA or not, raising questions of what adoption will mean in terms not just of day-to-day cataloguing but the wider retrieval world.</description>
    </item>
    
  </channel>
</rss>