<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Mahendra Mahey on Ariadne</title>
    <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/authors/mahendra-mahey/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Mahendra Mahey on Ariadne</description>
    <generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator>
    <language>en-gb</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2010 23:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    
	<atom:link href="http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/authors/mahendra-mahey/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    
    
    <item>
      <title>Why UK Further and Higher Education Needs Local Software Developers</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/65/mahey-walk/</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2010 23:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/65/mahey-walk/</guid>
      <description>Software developers are important to Further (FE) and Higher Education (HE). They are needed to develop and implement local FEI (Further Education Institution) and HEI (Higher Education Institution) solutions, to build e-infrastructure, and to innovate and develop ideas and prototypes that can be exploited by others. They also play an important part in the development and uptake of open standards and interoperability.
With the increasing accessibility and affordability of high-quality development tools, collaborative environments and industrial-grade infrastructure, the potential for even a single software developer advantageously to affect a wide range of activities in and around research, teaching and learning has never been so great.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>Towards a Toolkit for Implementing Application Profiles</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/62/chaudhri-et-al/</link>
      <pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/62/chaudhri-et-al/</guid>
      <description>The development of the Dublin Core Application Profiles (DCAPs) has been closely focussed on the construction of metadata standards targeted at specific resource types, on the implicit assumption that such a metadata solution would be immediately and usefully implementable in software environments that deal with such resources. The success of an application profile would thus be an inevitable consequence of correctly describing the generalised characteristics of those resources. Yet despite the earlier success of application profiles, more recent growth in usage of the DCAPs funded by the Joint Information Systems Committee (JISC) has been slow by comparison [1].</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>A Bug&#39;s Life?: How Metaphors from Ecology Can Articulate the Messy Details of Repository Interactions</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/57/robertson-et-al/</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/57/robertson-et-al/</guid>
      <description>VisionsIn &amp;lsquo;Lost in the IE&amp;rsquo;, published in the last issue of Ariadne and in subsequent discussion on various blogs [1], [2] there has some thoughtful reflection on the vision of the JISC Information Environment (IE), its architecture and standards, the role of the IE and the role of &amp;lsquo;that diagram&amp;rsquo; [3]. It is clear that the development of work on repositories and services in the UK has benefitted from the IE Architecture diagram but it is also clear that such a model does not (and was not intended to) reflect the reality of the &amp;lsquo;messiness&amp;rsquo; that inevitably surrounds connecting actual repositories and services [4].</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>Book Review: Against the Machine</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/57/mahey-rvw/</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/57/mahey-rvw/</guid>
      <description>As I spend a large part of my day (as I have for the last 12 years) in front of a computer screen connected to the Internet, I wondered what I was going to learn about a book that examines the effect that this technology has had on our culture, our minds and the way we socialise.
Lee Siegel is introduced as a cultural commentator and art critic who has written several books on these subjects as well as popular culture.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>Open Repositories 2008</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/56/or-08-rpt/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 23:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/56/or-08-rpt/</guid>
      <description>This was the third international Open Repositories Conference, the previous two being held in 2007, San Antonio, Texas [1] and in 2006, Sydney [2], so Europe was the third continent to host the event. Southampton was gloriously sunny for the five days of the conference (1-4 April), so there was no need to use the disposable plastic macs that were provided in the delegate bags. The event tends to attract people who have either already set up digital repositories in their institutions, are thinking about it or are interested in various aspects of repositories.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>ECDL 2007</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/53/ecdl-2007-rpt/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/53/ecdl-2007-rpt/</guid>
      <description>This was the first time this event was held in the majestic and architecturally impressive city of Budapest. It was organised by The Computer and Automation Research Institute of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences (MTA SZTAKI) [1] and held at the Europa Congress Centre.
The event brought together a very mixed group of people from computer scientists, researchers, librarians, professors and managers. There were over 200 participants, from 36 countries. There were a total of 119 full paper submissions of which 36 were accepted after peer review, giving an acceptance rate of 30%.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>What Is an Open Repository?</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/51/open-repos-rpt/</link>
      <pubDate>Sun, 29 Apr 2007 23:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/51/open-repos-rpt/</guid>
      <description>23-26 January 2007 saw the second Open RepositoriesConference [1], this year hosted at the enormous Marriott Rivercenter Hotel in San Antonio, Texas, around the corner from the Alamo. The conference followed on from the inaugural one held last year in Sydney [2], offering the U.S. repositories community an ideal opportunity to gather, together with a generous scattering of attendees from other parts of the world. With the strap-line &#39;achieving interoperability in an open world&#39;, the conference promoted interoperability and openness in various ways, not just between repositories on a technical level, but also between development communities, technical implementers, librarians and repository managers.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>The Second Digital Repositories Programme Meeting</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/47/jisc-repositories-rpt/</link>
      <pubDate>Sat, 29 Apr 2006 23:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/47/jisc-repositories-rpt/</guid>
      <description>The JISC (Joint Information Systems Committee) Digital Repositories Programme [1] held its second Programme meeting towards the end of March. Following in the collaborative tradition set by last October&#39;s joint Programme meeting with the Digital Preservation and Asset Management Programme [2], this gathering was themed around the cluster groups established by the Digital Repositories Programme [3] and included many guests from other JISC areas of work and beyond. These clusters seek to encompass many of the diverse issues being considered across the Digital Repositories Programme, including the different repository types (e-Learning and Scientific data), the infrastructural and technical issues (Integrating infrastructure and Machine services) and the social, cultural and legal topics (Legal and policy, Personal resource management strategies and Preservation).</description>
    </item>
    
  </channel>
</rss>