<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Michael Kennedy on Ariadne</title>
    <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/authors/michael-kennedy/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Michael Kennedy on Ariadne</description>
    <generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator>
    <language>en-gb</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    
	<atom:link href="http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/authors/michael-kennedy/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    
    
    <item>
      <title>Cautionary Tales: Archives 2.0 and the Diplomatic Historian</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/61/kennedy/</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/61/kennedy/</guid>
      <description>When I began writing this article, as a paper to a March 2009 conference on Archives 2.0 hosted by the Centre for Research on Socio-Cultural Change (CRESC) at the University of Manchester, Archives 2.0 was unknown territory to me [1]. I am a diplomatic historian, not an archivist, and though I am an end-user of archives, I had not come across the term Archives 2.0 before. The project I head, the Royal Irish Academy&#39;s Documents on Irish Foreign Policy (DIFP) series (http://www.</description>
    </item>
    
  </channel>
</rss>