<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Michel Wesseling on Ariadne</title>
    <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/authors/michel-wesseling/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Michel Wesseling on Ariadne</description>
    <generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator>
    <language>en-gb</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 23:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    
	<atom:link href="http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/authors/michel-wesseling/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    
    
    <item>
      <title>Publish and Cherish With Non-proprietary Peer Review Systems</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/59/waaijers/</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 23:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/59/waaijers/</guid>
      <description>Now that publications are increasingly being enriched with databases and audio-visual elements, the need for non-proprietary review systems – that is, peer review systems that do not require the assignment of copyright to the organiser of the peer review i.e. the publisher - is becoming ever-more pressing. Although there is a steadily growing number of peer-reviewed Open Access journals [1] and an active Open Access Scholarly Publishers Association [2], the supply fails to keep pace with the demand.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>Copyright Angst, Lust for Prestige and Cost Control: What Institutions Can Do to Ease Open Access</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/57/waaijers-et-al/</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/57/waaijers-et-al/</guid>
      <description>The view that the results of publicly financed research should also be publicly accessible enjoys broad support in the academic community. Where their own articles are concerned, however, many authors hesitate to circulate them openly, for example by publishing them in Open Access journals or placing them in their institution&amp;rsquo;s repository. They ask themselves whether that will not be at odds with the copyright rules and whether they will gain – or perhaps even lose – prestige.</description>
    </item>
    
  </channel>
</rss>