<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Stephen G. Nichols on Ariadne</title>
    <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/authors/stephen-g.-nichols/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Stephen G. Nichols on Ariadne</description>
    <generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator>
    <language>en-gb</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    
	<atom:link href="http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/authors/stephen-g.-nichols/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    
    
    <item>
      <title>Time to Change Our Thinking: Dismantling the Silo Model of Digital Scholarship</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/58/nichols/</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/58/nichols/</guid>
      <description>There is no longer anything exotic about digital humanities projects. Almost every humanities faculty has at least one. But like humanities disciplines themselves, digital projects too often exist in lonely splendour, each in its own sub-disciplinary silo. Classicists have their project(s), Middle English scholars post Chaucer and Langland manuscripts, while French medievalists have sites for major genres or authors from the troubadours to Christine de Pizan, and beyond. The situation is not appreciably different for digital humanities projects dealing with modern topics.</description>
    </item>
    
  </channel>
</rss>