<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Stuart Hannabuss on Ariadne</title>
    <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/authors/stuart-hannabuss/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Stuart Hannabuss on Ariadne</description>
    <generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator>
    <language>en-gb</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    
	<atom:link href="http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/authors/stuart-hannabuss/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    
    
    <item>
      <title>Book Review: Patent Failure - How Judges, Bureaucrats, and Lawyers Put Innovators at Risk</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/57/hannabuss-rvw/</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/57/hannabuss-rvw/</guid>
      <description>Arguments about intellectual property rights (IPR) never go away, particularly now that technological and market changes drive the legal agendas along very fast. Nowhere faster probably than in software and business-methods patents, one of the more colourful aspects of a highly litigious field today. Much of the debate centres on the USA where R&amp;amp;D spending is highest (particularly by big players, who incidentally have the most lucrative and best-defended patents). Indeed a recent decision by the Senate (May 2008, the time of writing) to remove the Patent Reform Act from its calendar (among other things it would have changed the first-to-invent rule to a first-to-file rule) has been seen by commentators as further evidence of patent and policy failure.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>Book Review: Copyright Compliance</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/56/hannabuss-rvw/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 23:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/56/hannabuss-rvw/</guid>
      <description>Books are not mushrooms and do not grow in the dark: we tend to know they&#39;re there and we know the frame within which they work. Copyright Compliance is one in a useful line of books about information law from Paul Pedley and others, published by Facet Publishing (which is owned by CILIP, the Chartered Institute of Library and Information Professionals, formerly The Library Association). This in turn is part of a wider interest and trend in legally orientated books for library and information practitioners, one that is very large indeed if we factor in studies of law and ethics in fields like software, patents, Internet, e-commerce, and telecoms.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>Book Review: Digital Information Culture</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/55/hannabuss-rvw/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 23:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/55/hannabuss-rvw/</guid>
      <description>This is an impressive and very useful book. It is impressive in drawing on a wide range of relevant ideas (on history, society, culture, technology) to tease out the ways in which we can validly speak about the cultural aspects of digital information. It is very useful because it will almost instantly join lists of recommended reading wherever information, knowledge and library studies are formally taught (it clearly derives from lectures but is all the clearer for that in this case, with none of the pedestrianism and derivativeness associated with that origin).</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>Book Review: Digital Copyright</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/54/hannabuss-rvw/</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/54/hannabuss-rvw/</guid>
      <description>The second edition of Digital Copyright is the print-book counterpart of the original e-book and, as such, will sell particularly well to libraries where training (and self-updating) is taken seriously and to educational establishments where people are trained for &#39;the profession&#39; (this is so hybrid now that perhaps no one book on information law can satisfy everyone - think of electronic communications law, Internet law, computing law, and the like, and specialist authors like Ian Lloyd on IT law).</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>Book Review: Essential Law for Information Professionals</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/49/hannabuss-rvw/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Oct 2006 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/49/hannabuss-rvw/</guid>
      <description>When you see a retail centre in a town, it is natural to wonder how central it really is : is it merely a claim? So when words like &#39;essential&#39; appear in book titles, we again wonder whether it is really so. Years of publishers&#39; blurbs and puffs induce irony, especially as we look along shelves of books with similar titles (and claims), above all for students and young professionals - essential psychology, essential statistics, essentials for Continuing Professional Development, essential law.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>Book Review: Managing Digital Rights - A Practitioner&#39;s Guide</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/43/hannabuss-rvw/</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2005 23:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/43/hannabuss-rvw/</guid>
      <description>Everyone is talking about digital and electronic rights these days. Rightly so. A wealth of legal advice is available in works like Simon Stokes&#39;s Digital Copyright : Law and Practice [1] which alert us to the many directions in which things are moving - digital rights management, ecommerce, virtual learning environments, software copyright, licences and contracts. This professional table d&#39;hôte indicates what information professionals are assumed to know. This is not just &#39;copyright in the information age&#39; any more - that is far too generalised : now people need advice on practice and procedures, the &#39;how&#39; now that the &#39;what&#39; is widely known.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>Book Review: Staying Legal</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/40/hannabuss-rvw/</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2004 23:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/40/hannabuss-rvw/</guid>
      <description>Like climbing Everest, information law is now a highly competitive field. The first edition of this work, edited by Chris Armstrong alone, appeared from Facet in 1999. It reflected the preoccupations of the mid-1990s, captured changing law like Internet regulation and database rights, and showed a growing understanding of information liability and the need properly to interpret contracts. It was good to return to what is clearly an overhauled text in the form of the second edition, this time edited by Chris Armstrong and Laurence Bebbington, well-known for his legal column in the UKOLOG Newsletter.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>Book Review: Joining Up the Dots</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/37/hannabuss-rvw/</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2003 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/37/hannabuss-rvw/</guid>
      <description>Any work on the information society attracts that ambivalent reaction that it might be trite and it could be seminal. But, with the logic that nothing that becomes cliché can be other than centrally relevant, above all when published by a professional body, (which should know these things), Challenge and change promises well. It aims for professional practice and academic study and will stand side-by-side with works like Feather&amp;rsquo;s Information society (2000) and Dearnley and Feather&amp;rsquo;s The wired world (2001) as particularly relevant to students on information/library courses, and new and prospective trainees and practitioners.</description>
    </item>
    
  </channel>
</rss>