<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Agile Development on Ariadne</title>
    <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/buzz/agile-development/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Agile Development on Ariadne</description>
    <generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator>
    <language>en-gb</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Jul 2013 23:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    
	<atom:link href="http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/buzz/agile-development/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    
    
    <item>
      <title>Editorial Introduction to Issue 71</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/71/editorial2/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jul 2013 23:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/71/editorial2/</guid>
      <description>As I depart this chair after the preparation of what I thought would be the last issue of Ariadne [1], I make no apology for the fact that I did my best to include as much material&amp;nbsp; to her ‘swan song’ as possible. With the instruction to produce only one more issue this year, I felt it was important to publish as much of the content in the pipeline as I could.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>Bring Your Own Policy: Why Accessibility Standards Need to Be Contextually Sensitive</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/71/kelly-et-al/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jul 2013 23:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/71/kelly-et-al/</guid>
      <description>Initiatives to enhance Web accessibility have previously focused on the development of guidelines which apply on a global basis. Legislation at national and international levels increasingly mandate conformance with such guidelines. However large scale surveys have demonstrated the failure of such approaches to produce any significant impact.
We review previous critiques of the limitations of such approaches and introduces a new scenario – content for people with learning disabilities – in order to illustrate the limitations of resource-based standards.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>Survive or Thrive</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/65/survive-thrive-rpt/</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2010 23:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/65/survive-thrive-rpt/</guid>
      <description>Survive or Thrive [1] is the punchy title given to an event intended to stimulate serious consideration amongst digital collections practitioners about future directions in our field - opportunities but also potential pitfalls. The event, which focused on content in HE, comes at a time of financial uncertainty when proving value is of increasing importance in the sector and at a point when significant investment has already been made in the UK into content creation, set against a backdrop of increasingly available content on the open Web from a multitude of sources.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>The Future of Interoperability and Standards in Education: A JISC CETIS Event</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/62/cetis-stds-2010-rpt/</link>
      <pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/62/cetis-stds-2010-rpt/</guid>
      <description>The stated intention of this working meeting organised by JISC CETIS, and held at the University of Bolton, UK, on 12 January 2010 was to:
&#39;[...] bring together participants in a range of standards organisations and communities to look at the future for interoperability standards in the education sector. The key topic for consideration is the relationship between specifications developed in informal communities and formal standards organisations and industry consortia. The meeting will also seek to explore the role of informal specification communities in rapidly developing, implementing and testing specifications in an open process before submission to more formal, possibly closed, standards bodies.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>Learning to YODL: Building York&#39;s Digital Library</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/61/stracchino-feng/</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/61/stracchino-feng/</guid>
      <description>An overview of the first phase of developing a digital repository for multimedia resources at York University has recently been outlined by Elizabeth Harbord and Julie Allinson in Ariadne [1]. This article aims to provide a technical companion piece reflecting on a year&amp;rsquo;s progress in the technical development of the repository infrastructure. As Allinson and Harbord&amp;rsquo;s earlier article explained, it was decided to build the architecture using Fedora Commons [2] as the underlying repository, with the user interface being provided by Muradora [3].</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>Building Open Source Communities: 4th OSS Watch Conference</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/44/oss-watch-rpt/</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2005 23:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/44/oss-watch-rpt/</guid>
      <description>When people get together and talk about open source, there are three things that come into the conversation early on. Firstly, they argue about open source licences; secondly, they ask &#34;but is it really free?&#34;; and thirdly, they state that &#34;it&#39;s all about the community&#34;. That last one is definitely worth unpacking further.
When a new project starts, or an existing project is being assessed, everyone will ask &#34;what sort of community does it have?</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>IWMW 2005</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/44/iwmw2005-rpt/</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2005 23:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/44/iwmw2005-rpt/</guid>
      <description>The 9th Institutional Web Management Workshop [1], a three-day event held at the Manchester Conference Centre [2], Manchester University [3], UK, 6-8 July 2005 had as its theme this year &#39;Whose web is it anyway?&#39;. How apt at a time when we are all continuing to attempt delivery of systems and services to meet users&#39; needs and requirements within institutional demands and pressures on resource. The format this year was six plenary sessions, two parallel workshop slots, two sessions for regional groups to discuss Content Management Systems (CMS), two panel sessions and one slot for delegates to attend an extra discussion session or look round the poster displays/vendor stalls.</description>
    </item>
    
  </channel>
</rss>