<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Altmetrics on Ariadne</title>
    <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/buzz/altmetrics/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Altmetrics on Ariadne</description>
    <generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator>
    <language>en-gb</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    
	<atom:link href="http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/buzz/altmetrics/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    
    
    <item>
      <title>The Value of Open Access Publishing to Health and Social Care Professionals in Ireland</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/73/lawton-flynn/</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/73/lawton-flynn/</guid>
      <description>This article will focus on how open access publishing may add value to a number of health and social care professionals and their work in the health services. The results of two recent surveys are explored in relation to the research activity, barriers and awareness about open access publishing by health and social care professionals (HSCPs) working in the Irish health system.
The majority of peer-reviewed research is published in subscription journals, which are only accessible to those in institutions, or those willing or able to pay subscription fees.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>Editorial Introduction to Issue 72</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/72/editorial/</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/72/editorial/</guid>
      <description>Change Is the Only ConstantIssue 72 is the product of a long period of almost constant change. In the last issue, Richard Waller waved adieu as the outgoing editor, explaining the circumstances around the change in the Editorial for Issue 71 [1]. Richard has left some very large shoes to fill in terms of the quality of articles and the guidance for authors in producing&amp;nbsp;readable and relevant&amp;nbsp;material.&amp;nbsp; The change is apparent when we look at the context in which Ariadne is now operating: the University of Bath Library has taken the reins, well aware of the regard in which the publication is held by its readers - a wide community with the unifying theme of information use, management and dissemination at its heart.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>Open Access and Research Conference 2013: Discovery, Impact and Innovation</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/72/oar-2013-rpt/</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/72/oar-2013-rpt/</guid>
      <description>Brisbane, Queensland, Australia was the host location for the second Open Access and Research 2013 conference [1]. The conference was held at the Queensland University of Technology (QUT), Gardens Point campus over 31 October – 1 November 2013. QUT has over 45,000 students and has a wide range of specialist research areas. There are two research institutes: The Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation (IHBI) which is a collaborative institute devoted to improving the health of individuals; and the Institute for Future Environments (IFE) which is a multidisciplinary institute focusing on our natural, built and virtual environments, and how to find ways to make them more sustainable, secure and resilient.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>Realising the Potential of Altmetrics within Institutions</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/72/liu-adie/</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/72/liu-adie/</guid>
      <description>The concept of alternative metrics as indicators of non-traditional forms of research impact – better known as ‘altmetrics’ – has been gaining significant attention and support from both the scholarly publishing and academic communities. After being adopted by many publishing platforms and institutional repositories within the past year, altmetrics have entered into the scholarly mainstream, emerging as a relevant topic for academic consideration amidst mounting opposition to misuse of the Journal Impact Factor.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>Gold Open Access: Counting the Costs </title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/70/andrew/</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/70/andrew/</guid>
      <description>Research Councils UK (RCUK) have recently announced a significant amendment to their open access (OA) &amp;nbsp;policy which requires all research papers that result from research partly or wholly funded by RCUK to be made open access [1]. To comply with this policy, researchers must either; a) publish in an open access journal, termed Gold OA, which often incurs an article processing charge (APC); or, b) ensure that a copy of the post-print is deposited in an appropriate repository, also known as Green OA.</description>
    </item>
    
  </channel>
</rss>