<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Data Model on Ariadne</title>
    <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/buzz/data-model/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Data Model on Ariadne</description>
    <generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator>
    <language>en-gb</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Jul 2013 23:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    
	<atom:link href="http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/buzz/data-model/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    
    
    <item>
      <title>DataFinder: A Research Data Catalogue for Oxford</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/71/rumsey-jefferies/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jul 2013 23:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/71/rumsey-jefferies/</guid>
      <description>In 2012 the University of Oxford Research Committee endorsed a university ‘Policy on the management of research data and records’ [1]. Much of the infrastructure to support this policy is being developed under the Jisc-funded Damaro Project [2]. The nascent services that underpin the University’s RDM (research data management) infrastructure have been divided into four themes:
RDM planning;managing live data;discovery and location; andaccess, reuse and curation.The data outputs catalogue falls into the third theme, and will result in metadata and interfaces that support discovery, location, citation and business reporting for Oxford research datasets.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>23rd International CODATA Conference</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/70/codata-2012-rpt/</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/70/codata-2012-rpt/</guid>
      <description>CODATA was formed by the International Council for Science (ICSU) in 1966 to co-ordinate and harmonise the use of data in science and technology. One of its very earliest decisions was to hold a conference every two years at which new developments could be reported. The first conference was held in Germany in 1968, and over the following years it would be held in&amp;nbsp; 15 different countries across 4 continents. My colleague Monica Duke and I attended the most recent conference in Taipei both to represent the Digital Curation Centre – CODATA&#39;s national member for the UK – and to participate in a track of talks on data publication and citation.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>euroCRIS Membership Meeting, Madrid</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/70/eurocris-2012-11-rpt/</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/70/eurocris-2012-11-rpt/</guid>
      <description>euroCRIS membership meetings [1] are held twice a year, providing members and invited participants with updates on strategic and Task Group progress and plans, as well as the opportunity to share experience of Current Research Information System (CRIS)-related developments and seek feedback. A CERIF (Common European Research Information Format) tutorial is usually included on the first morning for those new to the standard, and the host country reports on local CRIS initiatives in the ‘national’ session.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>JISC Research Information Management: CERIF Workshop</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/69/jisc-rim-cerif-rpt/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2012 23:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/69/jisc-rim-cerif-rpt/</guid>
      <description>A workshop on Research Information Management (RIM) and CERIF was held in Bristol on 27-28 June 2012, organised by the Innovation Support Centre [1] at UKOLN, together with the JISC RIM and RCSI (Repositories and Curation Shared Infrastructure) Programmes. It was a follow-up to the CERIF Tutorial and UK Data Surgery [2] held in Bath in February.
Workshop Scope and AimsThe aim was to bring together people working on the various elements of the UK RIM jigsaw to share experience of using CERIF and explore ways of working together more closely.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>The Future of the Past of the Web</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/68/fpw11-rpt/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/68/fpw11-rpt/</guid>
      <description>We have all heard at least some of the extraordinary statistics that attempt to capture the sheer size and ephemeral nature of the Web. According to the Digital Preservation Coalition (DPC), more than 70 new domains are registered and more than 500,000 documents are added to the Web every minute [1]. This scale, coupled with its ever-evolving use, present significant challenges to those concerned with preserving both the content and context of the Web.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>International Digital Curation Conference 2010</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/66/idcc-2010-rpt/</link>
      <pubDate>Sun, 30 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/66/idcc-2010-rpt/</guid>
      <description>The International Digital Curation Conference has been held annually by the Digital Curation Centre (DCC) [1] since 2005, quickly establishing a reputation for high-quality presentations and papers. So much so that, as co-chair Allen Renear explained in his opening remarks, after attending the 2006 Conference in Glasgow [2] delegates from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign (UIUC) offered to bring the event to Chicago. Thus it was that the sixth conference in the series [3], entitled &amp;lsquo;Participation and Practice: Growing the Curation Community through the Data Decade&amp;rsquo;, came to be held jointly by the DCC, UIUC and the Coalition for Networked Information (CNI).</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>Learning How to Play Nicely: Repositories and CRIS</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/64/wrn-repos-2010-05-rpt/</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 23:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/64/wrn-repos-2010-05-rpt/</guid>
      <description>More than 60 delegates convened at the Rose Bowl in Leeds on 7 May 2010 for this event to explore the developing relationship and overlap between Open Access research repositories and so called &#39;CRISs&#39; – Current Research Information Systems – that are increasingly being implemented at universities.
The Welsh Repository Network (WRN) [1], a collaborative venture between the Higher Education institutions (HEIs) in Wales, funded by JISC, had clearly hit upon an engaging topic du jour.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>Repository Software Comparison: Building Digital Library Infrastructure at LSE</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/64/fay/</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 23:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/64/fay/</guid>
      <description>Digital collections at LSE (London School of Economics and Political Science)[1] are significant and growing, as are the requirements of their users. LSE Library collects materials relevant to research and teaching in the social sciences, crossing the boundaries between personal and organisational archives, rare and unique printed collections and institutional research outputs. Digital preservation is an increasing concern alongside our commitment to continue to develop innovative digital services for researchers and students.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>Towards a Toolkit for Implementing Application Profiles</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/62/chaudhri-et-al/</link>
      <pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/62/chaudhri-et-al/</guid>
      <description>The development of the Dublin Core Application Profiles (DCAPs) has been closely focussed on the construction of metadata standards targeted at specific resource types, on the implicit assumption that such a metadata solution would be immediately and usefully implementable in software environments that deal with such resources. The success of an application profile would thus be an inevitable consequence of correctly describing the generalised characteristics of those resources. Yet despite the earlier success of application profiles, more recent growth in usage of the DCAPs funded by the Joint Information Systems Committee (JISC) has been slow by comparison [1].</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>Enhancing Scientific Communication through Aggregated Publications</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/61/hogenaar/</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/61/hogenaar/</guid>
      <description>The Internet has caused a revolution in the way scientists and scholars have access to scholarly output. Only 15 years ago, the (university) library decided what sources should be offered to the staff and individual scientists could only hope the librarian would listen to their wishes. In this system scientists frequently had no instantaneous access to the information they wanted. In such instances they had to rely on the Interlibrary Loan System.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>Open Repositories 2009</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/60/or-09-rpt/</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 23:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/60/or-09-rpt/</guid>
      <description>I recently attended the annual Open Repositories 2009 Conference [1] in Atlanta, Georgia which hosted 326 delegates from 23 countries. For myself, as the SWORD [2] Project Manager, the event proved to be very worthwhile. My colleague Julie Allinson and I were both able to give a plenary presentation on the first day and a half-day workshop on the final day.
Much of the conference addressed developments surrounding the Fedora, DSpace and EPrints systems that have occurred over the last year.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>Editorial Introduction to Issue 59: The Loneliness of the Long-distance Worker</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/59/editorial/</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 23:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/59/editorial/</guid>
      <description>I am grateful to Marieke Guy not least since she still manages to write for Ariadne when she has her own blog [1] on remote working to maintain. Having begun her series of articles with A Desk Too Far?: The Case for Remote Working, a treatment of the organisational issues surrounding the suitability of remote working as a business case, which she followed with a wealth of information on supportive technologies entitled Staying Connected: Technologies Supporting Remote Workers, Marieke returns, not exactly full circle, but back to an organisational perspective in her third contribution A Support Framework for Remote Workers.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>Spinning a Semantic Web for Metadata: Developments in the IEMSR</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/59/tonkin-strelnikov/</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 23:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/59/tonkin-strelnikov/</guid>
      <description>The IEMSR, a metadata schema registry, exists to support the development and use of metadata standards; in practice, what does this entail?
Metadata is not a recent invention. It dates from at least the time of the Library of Alexandria, at which hundreds of thousands of scrolls were described using a series of indexes retaining various characteristics such as line count, subject classification, author name and biography. However, specific metadata standards, schemas and vocabularies are created on a regular basis, falling into and out of favour as time passes and needs change.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>Assessing FRBR in Dublin Core Application Profiles</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/58/chaudhri/</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/58/chaudhri/</guid>
      <description>Efforts to create standard metadata records for resources in digital repositories have hitherto relied for the most part on the simple standard schema published by the Dublin Core Metadata Initiative (DCMI) [1], the Dublin Core Metadata Element Set, more commonly known as &#39;simple Dublin Core&#39; [2]. While this schema, by and large, met the aim of making metadata interoperable between repositories for purposes such as OAI-PMH [3], the explicit means by which it achieved this, a drastic simplification of the metadata associated with digital objects to only 15 elements, had the side effect of making it difficult or impossible to describe specific types of resources in detail [4].</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>Preservation and Archiving Special Interest Group (PASIG) Fall Meeting</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/58/sun-pasig-2008-11-rpt/</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/58/sun-pasig-2008-11-rpt/</guid>
      <description>I had managed to miss the previous two PASIG (Preservation and Archiving Special Interest Group)[1] meetings, so was delighted to find myself finally able to participate by attending the Fall meeting. Conveniently the event was arranged to follow immediately the SPARC Digital Repositories meeting [2], also held in Baltimore, and which I also attended.
PASIG is a group sponsored by and centred on Sun Microsystems (Sun) which is a prominent vendor of data storage hardware and which is building a new business around systems to support digital preservation and archiving.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>News and Events</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/57/newsline/</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/57/newsline/</guid>
      <description>TASI Courses for Remainder of 2008TASI (the JISC Advisory Service for still images, moving images and sound) has a few places left on its autumn/winter training programme. http://www.tasi.ac.uk/training/training.html
14 November 2008 Optimising your Images using Adobe Photoshop21 November 2008 Introduction to Image Metadata27 November 2008 Essential Techniques in Digital Image Capture28 November 2008 Advanced Techniques in Digital Image Capture03 December 2008 Digital Photography - Taking Control of your SLR11 December 2008 Scanning with the CLA Licence12 December 2008 Copyright and Digital ImagesThe following newly released course has just been added to the programme:</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>Open Repositories 2008</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/56/or-08-rpt/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 23:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/56/or-08-rpt/</guid>
      <description>This was the third international Open Repositories Conference, the previous two being held in 2007, San Antonio, Texas [1] and in 2006, Sydney [2], so Europe was the third continent to host the event. Southampton was gloriously sunny for the five days of the conference (1-4 April), so there was no need to use the disposable plastic macs that were provided in the delegate bags. The event tends to attract people who have either already set up digital repositories in their institutions, are thinking about it or are interested in various aspects of repositories.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>Metadata for Learning Resources: An Update on Standards Activity for 2008</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/55/currier/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 23:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/55/currier/</guid>
      <description>In 2002 the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) published the IEEE Learning Object Metadata standard (IEEE LOM) [1], superseding the IMS Learning Resource Meta-data specification [2], which had been developed and used through several versions since the mid-1990s.
Over the same general period, the Dublin Core Metadata Initiative (DCMI) had established the Dublin Core (DC) as a standard for describing all kinds of web-based resources [3]. The Dublin Core Education Working Group [4] emerged as one of several special interest groups [5] developing specific metadata elements [6] for the use of their communities.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>Book Review: Principles of Data Management</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/53/cliff-rvw/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/53/cliff-rvw/</guid>
      <description>Principles of Data Management might not sound like a thrilling title and, given its business focus, you might think not all that relevant to many readers of Ariadne. However, before dismissing it out of hand, consider this: may not the research outputs of an institution be regarded as business assets that require management (in, for example, an institutional repository)? On what other data does a university rely? Staffing, recruitment, enrolment, courses, library stock, costs?</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>Discussions from KIDMM Mash-up Day</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/53/kidmm-rpt/discussions.html</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/53/kidmm-rpt/discussions.html</guid>
      <description>Information Retrieval Today: An Overview of Issues and MethodsDiscussionDavid Pullinger (UK Cabinet Office), in charge of the pan-government search solution, commented that ordinary people searching for government documents use terms other than the government&#39;s argot. Ironically, Google finds these documents effectively, because it picks up words that are associated with links, often written in plainer English. Conrad drew attention to a 2003 paper on e-democracy by Danny Budzak [5], comparing terms used to describe services on local government Web sites to those chosen by users.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>V&amp;A Core Systems Integration Project</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/53/kidmm-rpt/csip-va.html</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/53/kidmm-rpt/csip-va.html</guid>
      <description>Hopes and DeliverablesNear the start of CSIP, a list of project deliverables was drawn up. To encourage &amp;lsquo;buy-in&amp;rsquo;, top of the list was something of evident value - a Gallery Services application to help staff give customers what they wanted to know at the point of enquiry. But to deliver this and other applications, the &amp;lsquo;Virtual Repository&amp;rsquo; would be necessary.
An early ambition was to be able to link images to the National Art Library (NAL) catalogue; unlike the collections database, the library catalogue software couldn&amp;rsquo;t talk to the digital asset management system.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>Book Review: Digital Preservation</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/50/pennock-rvw/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/50/pennock-rvw/</guid>
      <description>Digital Preservation is a promising volume that will prove useful to information professionals wishing to learn more about digital preservation, particularly in a cultural heritage context. This edited collection offers perspectives and overviews of different aspects of preservation, such as strategies, costs and metadata, by a select number of widely acknowledged experts. Other chapters cover Web archiving and Web archiving initiatives, European approaches to preservation, and digital preservation projects from around the globe.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>Fedora Users Conference</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/48/fedora-users-rpt/</link>
      <pubDate>Sat, 29 Jul 2006 23:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/48/fedora-users-rpt/</guid>
      <description>The Fedora Users Conference 2006, for users of the open source Fedora repository system [1] was the second to be run under the auspices of the core Fedora development team, following an initial conference at Rutgers University in June 2005. It is, though, one among a collection of conferences and meetings that have taken place over the past year based on using Fedora, with venues as diverse as Copenhagen, Aberystwyth, Sydney, and Hull.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>JISC/CNI Conference, York 2006</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/48/jisc-cni-rpt/</link>
      <pubDate>Sat, 29 Jul 2006 23:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/48/jisc-cni-rpt/</guid>
      <description>Encapsulating the events of such an information-rich event as the JISC / CNI conference can be a tricky task, but the next few lines will, we hope, deliver a flavour of the occasion as well as a summary of a few significant themes.
No single overarching theme dominated the event and indeed everyone we spoke to over the two-day event expressed a different opinion as to what they thought were the really important issues.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>QMSearch: A Quality Metrics-aware Search Framework</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/47/krowne/</link>
      <pubDate>Sat, 29 Apr 2006 23:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/47/krowne/</guid>
      <description>In this article we present a framework, QMSearch, which improves searching in the context of scholarly digital libraries by taking a &#39;quality metrics-aware&#39; approach. This means the digital library deployer or end-user can customise how results are presented, including aspects of both ranking and organisation in general, based upon standard metadata attributes and quality indicators derived from the general library information environment. To achieve this, QMSearch is generalised across metadata fields, quality indicators, and user communities, by abstracting all of these notions and rendering them into one or more &#39;organisation specifications&#39; which are used by the system to determine how to organise results.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>DC 2005</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/45/dc-2005-rpt/</link>
      <pubDate>Sat, 29 Oct 2005 23:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/45/dc-2005-rpt/</guid>
      <description>This year&#39;s DC Conference took place over four days in the excellent facilities of the University of Carlos III in Leganes, which is a few minutes train ride south of Madrid in Spain. In excess of two hundred people attended coming from 34 countries around the world. As always it was a busy conference with many parallel strands to choose between. The rest of this report therefore covers only a fraction of all the papers and work that happened there: it is a fairly personal selection drawn from some of the sessions I attended.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>Book Review: Metadata for Information Management and Retrieval</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/43/guy-rvw/</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2005 23:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/43/guy-rvw/</guid>
      <description>Anyone scaling the heights of metadata for the management and retrieval of digital information for the first time can be forgiven a degree of initial bewilderment. The same goes for this article, so a glossary of terms found here are offered in the spirit of saving readers&#39; time [1]. David Haynes&#39; book appears to go a long way to guiding its explorers through the foothills and beyond in this complete introduction to the subject for the information professional.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>What Are Your Terms?</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/43/johnston/</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2005 23:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/43/johnston/</guid>
      <description>The JISC Information Environment Metadata Schema Registry (IEMSR) Project [1] is funded by JISC through its Shared Services Programme to develop a metadata schema registry as a pilot shared service for the JISC Information Environment (JISC IE). Partners in the project are UKOLN, University of Bath and the Institute for Learning and Research Technology (ILRT), University of Bristol. The Centre for Educational Technology Interoperability Standards (CETIS) and the British Educational Communications and Technology Agency (Becta) are contributing to the project in an advisory capacity.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>Metadata Wanted for the Evanescent Library</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/36/maccoll-rpt/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2003 23:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/36/maccoll-rpt/</guid>
      <description>This event was organised jointly by UKOLN and the National e-Science Centre (NESC) [1]. Liz Lyon, Director of UKOLN, gave the introduction, reminding us that this was the second UKOLN-NESC workshop. The first happened about a year ago, bringing together the digital library and Grid computing communities for the first time. The presentations were as follows:
Building a Semantic Infrastructure - David De RoureWhy Ontologies? - Jeremy RogersPublishing and Sharing Schemas - Rachel Heery and Pete JohnstonImplementing Ontologies in (my)Grid Environments - Carole GobleKnowledge Organisation Systems - Doug TudhopeConcluding Remarks - Carole GobleBuilding a Semantic InfrastructureIn his introductory talk, Building a Semantic Infrastructure, Professor David De Roure of the University of Southampton, provided a history lesson at a gallop on the Grid and the Semantic Web.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>Collection Description Focus: Spreading the Gospel</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/31/cld/</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2002 23:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/31/cld/</guid>
      <description>The UK Collection Description Focus [1] was launched on 1 June 2001. It is a national post, jointly funded for a twelve-month period by the Joint Information Systems Committee/Distributed National Electronic Resource (JISC/DNER) [2], the Research Support Libraries Program (RSLP) [3] and the British Library [4]. The Focus is working towards improving co-ordination on collection description methods, schemas and tools, with the goal of ensuring consistency and compatibility of approaches across projects, disciplines, institutions and sectors.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>Architects of the Information Age</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/29/miller/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2001 23:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/29/miller/</guid>
      <description>In July of this year, Interoperability Focus [1] organised a meeting at the Office of the e–Envoy [2], the Cabinet Office unit responsible for driving forward the UK&amp;rsquo;s e–Government initiatives.
Across an increasing number of initiatives and programmes, there is a growing recognition of the need for common &amp;lsquo;architectures&amp;rsquo; within which truly useful applications and services may be constructed.
Partly, these architectures form a philosophical basis within which developments may be undertaken.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>The Filling in the PIE: HeadLine&#39;s Resource Data Model</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/27/paschoud/</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/27/paschoud/</guid>
      <description>&amp;nbsp;This article explains the concepts of representation and use of metadata describing library information resource collections in the Resource Data Model (RDM) that has been developed by the HeadLine project [http://www.headline.ac.uk/]. It is based on documentation originally intended for library staff who may become involved in maintenance of metadata in the RDM, as the deliverables of the project are handed-over into mainstream use. An earlier published article [Graham] was based on the first (un-released) version of the HeadLine RDM, to which this is intended to be an update.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>Metadata: Preservation 2000</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/26/metadata/</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/26/metadata/</guid>
      <description>The Cedars conference, &#34;Preservation 2000: an International Conference on the Preservation and Long Term Accessibility of Digital Materials,&#34; was held at the Viking Moat House Hotel in York on 7-8 December 2000. There were over 150 participants, about one half from outside the UK. As a prelude to the conference proper, a one-day workshop entitled &#34;Information Infrastructures for Digital Preservation&#34; was held at the same venue on the 6 December. This workshop mostly concerned preservation metadata and attracted over 70 participants.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>Application Profiles: Mixing and Matching Metadata Schemas</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/25/app-profiles/</link>
      <pubDate>Sat, 23 Sep 2000 23:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/25/app-profiles/</guid>
      <description>BackgroundThis paper introduces application profiles as a type of metadata schema. We use application profiles as a way of making sense of the differing relationship that implementors and namespace managers have towards metadata schema, and the different ways they use and develop schema. The idea of application profiles grew out of UKOLN&amp;rsquo;s work on the DESIRE project (1), and since then has proved so helpful to us in our discussions of schemas and registries that we want to throw it out for wider discussion in the run-up to the DC8 Workshop in Ottawa in October.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>Electronic Publication of Ancient Near Eastern Texts</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/22/epanet/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Dec 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/22/epanet/</guid>
      <description>The civilizations of the ancient Near East produced the world&#39;s first written texts. In both Egypt and Mesopotamia, recognizable texts begin to appear in the late fourth millennum B.C.[1] A well developed system of numerical tabulation combined with a varied and sophisticated repertoire of sealings and seal impression is evident even earlier across a wide geographical range in Western Asia[2] and evidence from recent archaeological discoveries in Egypt promises to push the origins of writing even further into antiquity.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>Metadata for Digital Preservation: An Update</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/22/metadata/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Dec 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/22/metadata/</guid>
      <description>In May 1997, the present author produced a short article for this column entitled &#34;Extending metadata for digital preservation&#34; [1]. The article introduced the idea of using metadata-based methods as a means of helping to manage the process of preserving digital information objects. At the time the article was first published, the term &#39;metadata&#39; was just beginning to be used by the library and information community (and others) to describe &#39;data about data&#39; that could be used for resource discovery.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>Metadiversity</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/18/metadiversity/</link>
      <pubDate>Sat, 19 Dec 1998 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/18/metadiversity/</guid>
      <description>Introduction and contextFirst, we simply need to be moving faster to coordinate the information that already exists, on file cards and computers, scattered around the world&amp;rsquo;s major and minor museums and other collections. &amp;hellip; Second these databases must be widely available and &amp;lsquo;customer friendly&amp;rsquo;. We need to accelerate current efforts for international cooperation and coordination, so that common formats are increasingly agreed and used.
Robert M. May (1994) [1].&amp;nbsp;
Biodiversity information managementThe management and exchange of information is an important part of the ongoing management of biodiversity and ecosystems.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>What Is RDF?</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/14/what-is/</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 1998 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/14/what-is/</guid>
      <description>What is RDF? It&amp;rsquo;s the Resource Description Framework. Does that help? No? RDF is the latest acronym to add to your list, one that is set to gain in significance in the future. At present though it is early days for RDF and little accessible information is available for the interested reader. This short summary will try to outline some key points regarding RDF and point to available further information. What is certain is that this summary will go out of date quickly, RDF is &amp;lsquo;work in progress&amp;rsquo; and is an area which is undergoing rapid development and change.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>Metadata Corner: DC5 - the Search for Santa</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/12/metadata/</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 1997 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/12/metadata/</guid>
      <description>Largely in recognition of the sterling work of the Nordic Metadata Project [1], invited representatives of the informal Dublin Core community set off to Finland&amp;rsquo;s lovely capital for the fifth Dublin Core workshop [2]. Following the success of their exploits Down Under [3], the authors once more fearlessly packed their rucksacks and embarked on a long and arduous voyage for the sake of Ariadne readers, selflessly braving outrageous Scandinavian beer prices and over-zealous representatives of Her Majesty&amp;rsquo;s Customs &amp;amp; Excise in their efforts to bring the latest news on Dublin Core to an anxiously waiting readership.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>Serving the Arts and Humanities</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/4/ahds/</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jul 1996 23:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/4/ahds/</guid>
      <description>Increasing scholarly use of computers and electronic resources raises a number of related challenges.
Computer-based research produces digital data with significant secondary use value. Yet that value cannot fully be realised unless the data are created and described according to relevant standards, systematically collected, preserved, and reported to the widest possible community.
The outpouring of digital resources which make up a growing share of our cultural heritage makes digital preservation an urgent cause.</description>
    </item>
    
  </channel>
</rss>