<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Dcap on Ariadne</title>
    <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/buzz/dcap/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Dcap on Ariadne</description>
    <generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator>
    <language>en-gb</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    
	<atom:link href="http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/buzz/dcap/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    
    
    <item>
      <title>Towards a Toolkit for Implementing Application Profiles</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/62/chaudhri-et-al/</link>
      <pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/62/chaudhri-et-al/</guid>
      <description>The development of the Dublin Core Application Profiles (DCAPs) has been closely focussed on the construction of metadata standards targeted at specific resource types, on the implicit assumption that such a metadata solution would be immediately and usefully implementable in software environments that deal with such resources. The success of an application profile would thus be an inevitable consequence of correctly describing the generalised characteristics of those resources. Yet despite the earlier success of application profiles, more recent growth in usage of the DCAPs funded by the Joint Information Systems Committee (JISC) has been slow by comparison [1].</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>Spinning a Semantic Web for Metadata: Developments in the IEMSR</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/59/tonkin-strelnikov/</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 23:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/59/tonkin-strelnikov/</guid>
      <description>The IEMSR, a metadata schema registry, exists to support the development and use of metadata standards; in practice, what does this entail?
Metadata is not a recent invention. It dates from at least the time of the Library of Alexandria, at which hundreds of thousands of scrolls were described using a series of indexes retaining various characteristics such as line count, subject classification, author name and biography. However, specific metadata standards, schemas and vocabularies are created on a regular basis, falling into and out of favour as time passes and needs change.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>Assessing FRBR in Dublin Core Application Profiles</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/58/chaudhri/</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/58/chaudhri/</guid>
      <description>Efforts to create standard metadata records for resources in digital repositories have hitherto relied for the most part on the simple standard schema published by the Dublin Core Metadata Initiative (DCMI) [1], the Dublin Core Metadata Element Set, more commonly known as &#39;simple Dublin Core&#39; [2]. While this schema, by and large, met the aim of making metadata interoperable between repositories for purposes such as OAI-PMH [3], the explicit means by which it achieved this, a drastic simplification of the metadata associated with digital objects to only 15 elements, had the side effect of making it difficult or impossible to describe specific types of resources in detail [4].</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>DC 2007</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/53/dc-2007-rpt/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/53/dc-2007-rpt/</guid>
      <description>The main theme of this year&#39;s international conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications was &#39;Application Profiles: Theory and Practice&#39; [1]. The conference was hosted by the Singapore National Library Board and held in the Intercontinental Hotel, which was across the road from the superb National Library building.
The main conference took place on the Tuesday, Wednesday and Thursday. The keynote talks and the presentations of full papers took place in plenary sessions.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>DC 2005</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/45/dc-2005-rpt/</link>
      <pubDate>Sat, 29 Oct 2005 23:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/45/dc-2005-rpt/</guid>
      <description>This year&#39;s DC Conference took place over four days in the excellent facilities of the University of Carlos III in Leganes, which is a few minutes train ride south of Madrid in Spain. In excess of two hundred people attended coming from 34 countries around the world. As always it was a busy conference with many parallel strands to choose between. The rest of this report therefore covers only a fraction of all the papers and work that happened there: it is a fairly personal selection drawn from some of the sessions I attended.</description>
    </item>
    
  </channel>
</rss>