<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Domain Model on Ariadne</title>
    <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/buzz/domain-model/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Domain Model on Ariadne</description>
    <generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator>
    <language>en-gb</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2010 23:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    
	<atom:link href="http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/buzz/domain-model/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    
    
    <item>
      <title>Survive or Thrive</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/65/survive-thrive-rpt/</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2010 23:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/65/survive-thrive-rpt/</guid>
      <description>Survive or Thrive [1] is the punchy title given to an event intended to stimulate serious consideration amongst digital collections practitioners about future directions in our field - opportunities but also potential pitfalls. The event, which focused on content in HE, comes at a time of financial uncertainty when proving value is of increasing importance in the sector and at a point when significant investment has already been made in the UK into content creation, set against a backdrop of increasingly available content on the open Web from a multitude of sources.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>Towards a Toolkit for Implementing Application Profiles</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/62/chaudhri-et-al/</link>
      <pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/62/chaudhri-et-al/</guid>
      <description>The development of the Dublin Core Application Profiles (DCAPs) has been closely focussed on the construction of metadata standards targeted at specific resource types, on the implicit assumption that such a metadata solution would be immediately and usefully implementable in software environments that deal with such resources. The success of an application profile would thus be an inevitable consequence of correctly describing the generalised characteristics of those resources. Yet despite the earlier success of application profiles, more recent growth in usage of the DCAPs funded by the Joint Information Systems Committee (JISC) has been slow by comparison [1].</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>Live Blogging @ IWMW 2009</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/61/iwmw-2009-rpt/</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/61/iwmw-2009-rpt/</guid>
      <description>The 12th annual Institutional Web Managers Workshop (IWMW) attracted nearly 200 delegates, making it the largest workshop in the event&#39;s history. Whilst the popularity of the physical event has grown, so too has the remote audience. So this year organisers Marieke Guy and Brian Kelly decided that it was time to start treating this remote audience as first class citizens.
That&#39;s where I came in. As live blogger, my job was to amplify IWMW 2009; providing a live commentary via Twitter on the dedicated @iwmwlive account, blogging on the IWMW 2009 blog [1], uploading video interviews and co-ordinating all the online resources via a NetVibes page [2] to give the remote audience a more complete experience of attending and to create a digital footprint for the proceedings, complementing the fantastic live video streaming provided by the University of Essex.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>Assessing FRBR in Dublin Core Application Profiles</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/58/chaudhri/</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/58/chaudhri/</guid>
      <description>Efforts to create standard metadata records for resources in digital repositories have hitherto relied for the most part on the simple standard schema published by the Dublin Core Metadata Initiative (DCMI) [1], the Dublin Core Metadata Element Set, more commonly known as &#39;simple Dublin Core&#39; [2]. While this schema, by and large, met the aim of making metadata interoperable between repositories for purposes such as OAI-PMH [3], the explicit means by which it achieved this, a drastic simplification of the metadata associated with digital objects to only 15 elements, had the side effect of making it difficult or impossible to describe specific types of resources in detail [4].</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>Metadata for Learning Resources: An Update on Standards Activity for 2008</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/55/currier/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 23:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/55/currier/</guid>
      <description>In 2002 the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) published the IEEE Learning Object Metadata standard (IEEE LOM) [1], superseding the IMS Learning Resource Meta-data specification [2], which had been developed and used through several versions since the mid-1990s.
Over the same general period, the Dublin Core Metadata Initiative (DCMI) had established the Dublin Core (DC) as a standard for describing all kinds of web-based resources [3]. The Dublin Core Education Working Group [4] emerged as one of several special interest groups [5] developing specific metadata elements [6] for the use of their communities.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>DC 2007</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/53/dc-2007-rpt/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/53/dc-2007-rpt/</guid>
      <description>The main theme of this year&#39;s international conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications was &#39;Application Profiles: Theory and Practice&#39; [1]. The conference was hosted by the Singapore National Library Board and held in the Intercontinental Hotel, which was across the road from the superb National Library building.
The main conference took place on the Tuesday, Wednesday and Thursday. The keynote talks and the presentations of full papers took place in plenary sessions.</description>
    </item>
    
  </channel>
</rss>