<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Managerialism on Ariadne</title>
    <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/buzz/managerialism/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Managerialism on Ariadne</description>
    <generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator>
    <language>en-gb</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    
	<atom:link href="http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/buzz/managerialism/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    
    
    <item>
      <title>Book Review: Digital Dieting - From Information Obesity to Intellectual Fitness</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/72/sanders-rvw/</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/72/sanders-rvw/</guid>
      <description>Following a body of work that includes The University of Google: Education in the (post) Information Age (2007) [1] and Digital Hemlock: Internet Education and the Poisoning of Teaching (2002), Brabazon has developed a central position within the debate surrounding technology and pedagogy, although there is very little that is centrist about Brabazon&#39;s writing.
Developing Contextual ThemesWith Digital Dieting: From Information Obesity to Intellectual Fitness (2013) Brabazon’s primary research interests in media, information and digital literacies are extended even further into the core issues binding contemporary Higher Education (HE) and learning in a world surrounded by an excess of online information, and the political framework that surrounds it.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>Academic Liaison Librarianship: Curatorial Pedagogy or Pedagogical Curation?</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/65/parsons/</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2010 23:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/65/parsons/</guid>
      <description>When reflecting on a methodological approach and set of research practices with which he was closely associated, Bruno Latour suggested that, &amp;ldquo;there are four things that do not work with actor-network theory; the word actor, the word network, the word theory and the hyphen!&amp;rdquo; [1]. In a similar vein, it could be suggested that, &amp;ldquo;there are three things that do not work with academic liaison librarianship: the word academic, the word liaison and the word librarianship&amp;rdquo;.</description>
    </item>
    
  </channel>
</rss>