<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Pics on Ariadne</title>
    <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/buzz/pics/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Pics on Ariadne</description>
    <generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator>
    <language>en-gb</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Jan 2003 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    
	<atom:link href="http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/buzz/pics/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    
    
    <item>
      <title>Web Watch: A Survey of Web Server Software Used by UK University Web Sites</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/34/web-watch/</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jan 2003 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/34/web-watch/</guid>
      <description>A survey of Web server software used on UK University Web sites was carried out in October 1997 and the findings were reported in Ariadne issue 12 [1]. The survey was repeated in September 2000 and the updated findings published in Ariadne issue 21 [2].
The survey was repeated in November 2002 and the findings are published in this article.
Current SurveyThe survey was carried out on 21th November 2002. This time the survey made use of the HTTP header Wizards tool provided by the University of Dundee [3].</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>WWW2002 Here</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/32/www2002/</link>
      <pubDate>Sun, 07 Jul 2002 23:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/32/www2002/</guid>
      <description>WWW2002 [1] was the 11th annual World Wide Web Conference, held this year in Tourist Hell (Waikiki), Hawaii. WWW2002 ran over three days, with 10 refereed tracks including one on the Semantic Web, and six &amp;lsquo;alternate&amp;rsquo; tracks. All the papers from the conference are available online in html [2]. You might also like to look at the RDF Interest group chatlogs and blog pages for the days covering the conference [3] and I also have some photos [4] as does Dave Beckett [5].</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>An Overview of Subject Gateway Activities in Australia</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/21/subject-gateways/</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Sep 1999 23:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/21/subject-gateways/</guid>
      <description>This information paper was written by the National Library of Australia to describe the scope and intent of four of Australia&#39;s national subject gateways:&amp;nbsp;Agrigate [2],&amp;nbsp;the Australian Virtual Engineering Library (AVEL) [3],&amp;nbsp;EdNA Online - the website of the Education Network of Australia (EdNA) [4], and&amp;nbsp;MetaChem [5].
The four criteria shaping subject gateway development were identified as an operational framework, standards &amp;amp; guidelines, quality of service delivery, and scope. They have been mapped to the characteristics of the Australian subject gateways as described below.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>Metadata: Workshop in Luxembourg </title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/20/metadata/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jun 1999 23:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/20/metadata/</guid>
      <description>The Metadata Workshop held in Luxembourg on the 12 April was the third in an ongoing series of such meetings. The first Metadata Workshop was held in December 1997 and included a tutorial on metadata provided by UKOLN, some project presentations and break-out sessions on various metadata issues [1, 2]. The second workshop, held in June 1998, concentrated more on technical and strategic issues [3]. Around 50 people attended the third workshop, mostly drawn from organisations involved in European Union funded projects supplemented by a few Commission staff.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>RDF Seminar</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/15/events/stakis.html</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 May 1998 23:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/15/events/stakis.html</guid>
      <description>On the 8th May, following almost immediately after their MODELS 7 Workshop, UKOLN hosted a half-day seminar entitled “RDF: What is it all about?”. RDF, or Resource Description Framework, is one of the latest TLAs (Three Letter Acronyms) to emerge from the W3C (World Wide Web Consortium), and is of particular pertinence to the library and collection management communities as one of its intended applications is the interchange of catalogue or metadata.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>Web Focus: The 7th World Wide Web Conference</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/15/web-focus/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 May 1998 23:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/15/web-focus/</guid>
      <description>Australia is a long way to go for a conference. What were you doing there?
I attended the conference in my role as UK Web Focus and the JISC representative on the World Wide Web Consortium. Attendenance at the World Wide Web conference provides me with an opportunity to monitor the latest Web developments and keep the community informed.
What were the highlights of the conference?
In a three letter acronym - RDF!</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>Web Focus Corner: The World Wide Web Consortium</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/13/web-focus/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 1998 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/13/web-focus/</guid>
      <description>Launch of the W3C-LA InitiativeOn Wednesday 3rd December Tim Berners-Lee, the British computer scientist who invented the World Wide Web, was one of the guest speakers at a meeting held in London to mark the launch of the W3C-LA, an initiative funded by the European Union&amp;rsquo;s Esprit programme aimed at leveraging the Web for European Industry. The meeting [1] provided an opportunity for W3C staff members to summarise recent developments to web protocols.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>Metadata Corner: DC5 - the Search for Santa</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/12/metadata/</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 1997 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/12/metadata/</guid>
      <description>Largely in recognition of the sterling work of the Nordic Metadata Project [1], invited representatives of the informal Dublin Core community set off to Finland&amp;rsquo;s lovely capital for the fifth Dublin Core workshop [2]. Following the success of their exploits Down Under [3], the authors once more fearlessly packed their rucksacks and embarked on a long and arduous voyage for the sake of Ariadne readers, selflessly braving outrageous Scandinavian beer prices and over-zealous representatives of Her Majesty&amp;rsquo;s Customs &amp;amp; Excise in their efforts to bring the latest news on Dublin Core to an anxiously waiting readership.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>Web Focus: WebWatching UK Universities and Colleges</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/12/web-focus/</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 1997 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/12/web-focus/</guid>
      <description>About WebWatchWebWatch is a one year project funded by the British Library Research and Innovation Centre (BLRIC) [1]. The main aim of WebWatch is to develop and use robot software to analyse the use of web technologies with various UK communities and to report on the findings to various interested communities. Other aims of WebWatch include:
Evaluation of robot technologies and making recommendations on appropriate technologies.Analysis of the results obtained, and liaising with the relevant communities in interpreting the analyses and making recommendations.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>Clifford Lynch in Interview</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/10/clifford/</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 1997 23:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/10/clifford/</guid>
      <description>Z39.50 has been around for a long time, now - why do you think it has not been assimilated into networked retrieval applications and technologies to the extent of e.g. CD-ROMs, the Web?
I think that Z39.50 is now well established for large, if you will, mainframe or server-based systems. Certainly, those folks who wonder what real Z39.50 systems are in use could look at institutions like the University of California, where we have had it in production for a number of years, and we&#39;re using it every day to provide access to our community of close to a quarter of a million people, to resources mounted at places like OCLC and RLG.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>Dublin Core Management</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/10/dublin/</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 1997 23:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/10/dublin/</guid>
      <description>The Dublin Core Metadata Element Set (the Dublin Core) [1] is a 15 element metadata set that is primarily intended to aid resource discovery on the Web. The elements in the Dublin Core are TITLE, SUBJECT, DESCRIPTION, CREATOR, PUBLISHER, CONTRIBUTOR, DATE, TYPE, FORMAT, IDENTIFIER, SOURCE, LANGUAGE, RELATION, COVERAGE and RIGHTS. As we begin to consider some initial implementations using the Dublin Core we need to consider how best to manage large amounts of metadata across a Web-site.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>Metadata, PICS and Quality</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/9/pics/</link>
      <pubDate>Sun, 18 May 1997 23:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/9/pics/</guid>
      <description>A recent Ariadne article by Anagnostelis, Cooke and McNab ended with a reference to the Platform for Internet Content Selection (PICS) [1] and added that while PICS controls neither the publication nor the distribution of information, it offers &amp;ldquo;individuals and organisations the option of filtering out or filtering in selected views of networked information&amp;rdquo;. There follows a reference to the Centre for Information Quality Management (CIQM) and its proposal to use PICS filtering in order to allow users to set constraints on the minimum quality of resources retrieved [2].</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>Never Mind the Quality, Check the Badge-Width!</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/9/quality-ratings/</link>
      <pubDate>Sun, 18 May 1997 23:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/9/quality-ratings/</guid>
      <description>How does the World Health Organization rate compared to Medical Students for Choice (a reproductive health rights group)? How do the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention score across a range of review services? As commentators begin to question the value of much of the information currently available on the Internet, how helpful are stars, badges or seals of approval (SOAPs) in identifying quality resources? Is a &#34;Cool site of the moment&#34;</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>Down Under With the Dublin Core</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/8/canberra-metadata/</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 1997 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/8/canberra-metadata/</guid>
      <description>Continuing a long and glorious tradition, the 4th Dublin Core Workshop [1] last month went to a really nice country and picked one of the least lively settlements in which to meet. Admittedly, in the company of such as Dublin (Ohio, USA, rather than the somewhat more picturesque capital of Eire) and Coventry, Canberra did rather manage to shine.
Nobly sacrificing sleep, wintry weather and the monotony of their offices for the higher cause that is metadata, the authors and two other UK representatives (Dave Beckett from the University of Kent at Canterbury and Rachel Heery from the UK Office of Library &amp;amp; Information Networking, UKOLN) descended upon an unsuspecting Australia.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>Introducing Web Focus</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/8/web-focus/</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 1997 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/8/web-focus/</guid>
      <description>I first saw the Web in December 1992 at a meeting of the Information Exchange Special Interest Group at Leeds University. At that time, as Information Officer in the Computing Service, I was looking for software which could be used to develop a Campus Wide Information System (CWIS). Quite a number of institutions in the UK were running CWISes, mainly based on home-grown software, but some were beginning to make use of Internet tools, such as Gopher.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>The Resource Discovery Project</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/8/resource-discovery/</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 1997 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/8/resource-discovery/</guid>
      <description>Resource Discovery at DSTCThe Resource Discovery Project is one of the major research units of the Distributed Systems Technology Centre (DSTC). The DSTC is one of over 60 co-operative research centres in Australia and is a Federally and commercially funded non-profit company. The DSTC has over 25 participating organisations which provide resources to the research program, including, direct funding, seconded staff, hardware and software, and importantly, research problems. The Resource Discovery Project was established in mid 1994 after the emerging problem of information discovery on large networks was identified as a crucial research area for Australian data networks.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>OMNI Seminar</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/7/omni-seminar/</link>
      <pubDate>Sun, 19 Jan 1997 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/7/omni-seminar/</guid>
      <description>Over 150 people gathered at the Wellcome Institute in London on the 23 January to attend the 2nd Annual OMNI [1] Seminar. This brought together a range of participants including medical academics, library and information professionals and practitioners; a good indication of the impact OMNI has had during its first two years.
The keynote address was given by Lynne Brindley, the chair of the new JISC Committee for Electronic Information (CEI).</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>Wire: Interview with Nick Gibbins</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/7/wire/</link>
      <pubDate>Sun, 19 Jan 1997 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/7/wire/</guid>
      <description>What are you doing now?
I&#39;m studying for a Masters in Knowledge Based Systems at Edinburgh University&#39;s Department of Artificial Intelligence.
...and what where you doing before?
Before this academic year I was a software engineer working for Nokia Telecommunications in Cambridge on a variety of network management products.
Why the jump from the networkie side of a telecoms company to doing a masters degree? 
Mainly for financial reasons, I think.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>ROADS: Resource Organisation and Discovery in Subject-Based Services</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/3/roads/</link>
      <pubDate>Sat, 18 May 1996 23:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/3/roads/</guid>
      <description>As MARC and cataloguing give way to metadata and resource description, the true impact of the internet is realised. Cataloguers are being transformed to.....metaloguers(?). The ranks of library school students who sat bemused through lectures on UKMARC and AACR need to indulge in a bit of reconstruction. Really they were applying a canonical syntactical representation to related manifestations, and maybe occasionally considering extensibility. They were doing metadata. And if we had realised that a bit earlier, maybe we would be as rich as Jerry Yang and David Filo; as reported in mid-April, the public share offering in the internet &#39;catalogue&#39; Yahoo!</description>
    </item>
    
  </channel>
</rss>