<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Relax Ng on Ariadne</title>
    <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/buzz/relax-ng/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Relax Ng on Ariadne</description>
    <generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator>
    <language>en-gb</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    
	<atom:link href="http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/buzz/relax-ng/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    
    
    <item>
      <title>Assessing FRBR in Dublin Core Application Profiles</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/58/chaudhri/</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/58/chaudhri/</guid>
      <description>Efforts to create standard metadata records for resources in digital repositories have hitherto relied for the most part on the simple standard schema published by the Dublin Core Metadata Initiative (DCMI) [1], the Dublin Core Metadata Element Set, more commonly known as &#39;simple Dublin Core&#39; [2]. While this schema, by and large, met the aim of making metadata interoperable between repositories for purposes such as OAI-PMH [3], the explicit means by which it achieved this, a drastic simplification of the metadata associated with digital objects to only 15 elements, had the side effect of making it difficult or impossible to describe specific types of resources in detail [4].</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>A Dublin Core Application Profile for Scholarly Works</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/50/allinson-et-al/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/50/allinson-et-al/</guid>
      <description>In May 2006, the Joint Information Systems Committee (JISC) [1] approached UKOLN [2] and the Eduserv Foundation [3] to collaborate on the development of a metadata specification for describing eprints (alternatively referred to as scholarly works, research papers or scholarly research texts) [4]. A Dublin Core (DC) [5] application profile was chosen as the basis of the specification given the widespread use of DC in existing repositories, the flexibility and extensibility of the DCMI Abstract Model [6] and its compatibility with the Semantic Web [7].</description>
    </item>
    
  </channel>
</rss>