<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Rfc on Ariadne</title>
    <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/buzz/rfc/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Rfc on Ariadne</description>
    <generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator>
    <language>en-gb</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2012 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    
	<atom:link href="http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/buzz/rfc/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    
    
    <item>
      <title>Motivations for the Development of a Web Resource Synchronisation Framework</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/70/lewis-et-al/</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/70/lewis-et-al/</guid>
      <description>This article describes the motivations behind the development of the ResourceSync Framework. The Framework addresses the need to synchronise resources between Web sites. &amp;nbsp;Resources cover a wide spectrum of types, such as metadata, digital objects, Web pages, or data files. &amp;nbsp;There are many scenarios in which the ability to perform some form of synchronisation is required. Examples include aggregators such as Europeana that want to harvest and aggregate collections of resources, or preservation services that wish to archive Web sites as they change.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>What Is a URI and Why Does It Matter?</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/65/thompson-hs/</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2010 23:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/65/thompson-hs/</guid>
      <description>URI stands for Uniform Resource Identifier, the official name for those things you see all the time on the Web that begin &#39;http:&#39; or &#39;mailto:&#39;, for example http://www.w3.org/, which is the URI for the home page of the World Wide Web Consortium [1]. (These things were called URLs (Uniform Resource Locators) in the early days of the Web, and the change from URL to URI is either hugely significant or completely irrelevant, depending on who is talking—I have nothing to say about this issue in this article.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>Abstract Modelling of Digital Identifiers</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/62/nicholas-et-al/</link>
      <pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/62/nicholas-et-al/</guid>
      <description>Discussion of digital identifiers, and persistent identifiers in particular, has often been confused by differences in underlying assumptions and approaches. To bring more clarity to such discussions, the PILIN Project has devised an abstract model of identifiers and identifier services, which is presented here in summary. Given such an abstract model, it is possible to compare different identifier schemes, despite variations in terminology; and policies and strategies can be formulated for persistence without committing to particular systems.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>The European Film Gateway</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/58/eckes-segbert/</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/58/eckes-segbert/</guid>
      <description>The European Film Gateway (EFG) [1] is one in a series of projects funded by the European Commission, under the eContentplus Programme, with the aim of contributing to the development and further enhancement of Europeana - the European digital library, museum and archive [2]. Officially launched on 20 November 2008, the prototype Europeana service provides access to about four million digital objects from archives, audio-visual archives, museums and libraries across Europe.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>Get Tooled Up: SeeAlso: A Simple Linkserver Protocol</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/57/voss/</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/57/voss/</guid>
      <description>In recent years the principle of Service-oriented Architecture (SOA) has grown increasingly important in digital library systems. More and more core functionalities are becoming available in the form of Web-based, standardised services which can be combined dynamically to operate across a broader environment [1]. Standard APIs for searching (SRU [2] [3], OpenSearch [4]), harvesting and syndication (OAI-OMH [5], ATOM [6]), copying (unAPI [7] [8]), publishing, editing (AtomPub [9], Jangle [10], SRU Update [11]), and more basic library operations, either already exist or are being developed.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>Persistent Identifiers: Considering the Options</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/56/tonkin/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 23:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/56/tonkin/</guid>
      <description>What Is a Persistent Identifier, and Why?Persistent identifiers (PIs) are simply maintainable identifiers that allow us to refer to a digital object – a file or set of files, such as an e-print (article, paper or report), an image or an installation file for a piece of software. The only interesting persistent identifiers are also persistently actionable (that is, you can &amp;ldquo;click&amp;rdquo; them); however, unlike a simple hyperlink, persistent identifiers are supposed to continue to provide access to the resource, even when it moves to other servers or even to other organisations.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>The Networked Library Service Layer: Sharing Data for More Effective Management and Cooperation</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/56/gatenby/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 23:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/56/gatenby/</guid>
      <description>Libraries&amp;rsquo; collections fall into three parts: physical, digital and licensed. These are managed by multiple systems, ILS (Integrated Library System), ERM (Electronic Records Management), digital management, digital repositories, resolvers, inter-library loan and reference. At the same time libraries are increasingly co-operating in collecting and storing resources. This article examines how to identify data that is best located at global, collective and local levels. An example is explored, namely the benefits of moving data from different local systems to the network level to manage acquisition of the total collection as a whole and in combination with consortia members.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>SWORD: Simple Web-service Offering Repository Deposit</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/54/allinson-et-al/</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/54/allinson-et-al/</guid>
      <description>This article offers a twofold introduction to the JISC-funded SWORD [1] Project which ran for eight months in mid-2007. Firstly it presents an overview of the methods and madness that led us to where we currently are, including a timeline of how this work moved through an informal working group to a lightweight, distributed project. Secondly, it offers an explanation of the outputs produced for the SWORD Project and their potential benefits for the repositories community.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>Introducing UnAPI</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/48/chudnov-et-al/</link>
      <pubDate>Sat, 29 Jul 2006 23:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/48/chudnov-et-al/</guid>
      <description>Common Web tools and techniques cannot easily manipulate library resources. While photo sharing, link logging, and Web logging sites make it easy to use and reuse content, barriers still exist that limit the reuse of library resources within new Web services. [1][2] To support the reuse of library information in Web 2.0-style services, we need to allow many types of applications to connect with our information resources more easily. One such connection is a universal method to copy any resource of interest.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>Joint Workshop on Future-proofing Institutional Websites</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/46/dcc-fpw-rpt/</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2006 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/46/dcc-fpw-rpt/</guid>
      <description>This DCC [1] and Wellcome Library [2] workshop sought to provide insight into ways that content creators and curators can ensure ongoing access to reliable Web sites over time. The issue is not merely one of archiving; it is also about designing and managing a Web site so that it is suitable for long-term preservation with minimum intervention by curators to ensure the content remains reliable and understandable through time.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>ECDL-2003 Web Archiving</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/37/ecdl-web-archiving-rpt/</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2003 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/37/ecdl-web-archiving-rpt/</guid>
      <description>On 21 August 2003, the 3rd ECDL Workshop on Web Archives [1] [2] was held in Trondheim, Norway in association with the 7th European Conference on Digital Libraries (ECDL) [3]. This event was the third in a series of annual workshops that have been held in association with the ECDL conferences held in Darmstadt [4] and Rome [5]. These earlier workshops primarily focused on the activities of legal deposit libraries and the collection strategies and technologies being used by Web archiving initiatives [6].</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>Metadata: I Am a Name and a Number</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/24/metadata/</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Jun 2000 23:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/24/metadata/</guid>
      <description>People, places, and things are identified in any number of different ways.
I, for example, have a National Insurance Number, a staff payroll number, several bank account numbers, and assorted frequent flyer programme membership numbers, all of which are the handles that certain groups of people use to identify me. I also have a name and, associated to me, three telephone numbers and at least two e-mail addresses. Neither telephone number nor e-mail address truly identifies me the person of course, but they might well be seen as equally useful a means of &#39;retrieving&#39; me as my name or any other associated identifier.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>Web Mirrors: Building the UK Mirror Service</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/22/web-mirror/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Dec 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/22/web-mirror/</guid>
      <description>On 1st August 1999 the UK Mirror Service [1] replaced HENSA as the JISC [2] funded mirror service for the UK academic community. The new service is run by the same teams at Kent and Lancaster that supported the HENSAs, but it is not merely a revamp of the HENSA sites; there are some fundamental changes.
This article takes a look at the implementation of the service and our plans for the future.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>Web Focus: Technical Aspects of Copyright and the Web</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/10/web-focus/</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 1997 23:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/10/web-focus/</guid>
      <description>In April a former colleague of mine from Leeds University sent a message to me about a strange copyright statement she had come across on the web, and asked for my comments. I was also intrigued by the statement and, on 23 April, sent the following message to the lis-elib Mailbase list
&amp;nbsp;
A strange copyright statment (sic) at the URL http://clans.cla.co.uk/www/auths.html  has been brought to my attention.
It states that readers are not authorised to:</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>Internationalisation and the Web</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/9/trenches/</link>
      <pubDate>Sun, 18 May 1997 23:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/9/trenches/</guid>
      <description>The World Wide Web is intended to be &amp;ldquo;an embodiment of human knowledge&amp;rdquo; [1] but is currently mainly an embodiment of only West European and North American knowledge resources. The reason for this is simple; despite the name, the development of the World Wide Web has until recently been very heavily oriented towards English and other Western European languages[2]. If you want to display a resource with an ideographic character sets from Asian languages for example then you have been forced to either use inlined images or localized, kludged versions of software.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>Down Under With the Dublin Core</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/8/canberra-metadata/</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 1997 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/8/canberra-metadata/</guid>
      <description>Continuing a long and glorious tradition, the 4th Dublin Core Workshop [1] last month went to a really nice country and picked one of the least lively settlements in which to meet. Admittedly, in the company of such as Dublin (Ohio, USA, rather than the somewhat more picturesque capital of Eire) and Coventry, Canberra did rather manage to shine.
Nobly sacrificing sleep, wintry weather and the monotony of their offices for the higher cause that is metadata, the authors and two other UK representatives (Dave Beckett from the University of Kent at Canterbury and Rachel Heery from the UK Office of Library &amp;amp; Information Networking, UKOLN) descended upon an unsuspecting Australia.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>Performance and Security: Notes for System Administrators</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/8/unix-security/</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 1997 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/8/unix-security/</guid>
      <description>The eLib Technical Concertation day last November brought together techies from many of the eLib projects. (See Clare McClean&amp;rsquo;s report in Ariadne issue 6 for more details [1]). A wide range of the technical issues associated with running electronic library services were discussed at the meeting but inevitably, given the time constraints, some of these were not covered in any great detail. However, two issues were clear from the meeting; that server performance and system security were both areas of concern to system administrators and that most eLib projects were using UNIX based machines to make their services available.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>Securing HTML FORMs</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/5/securing-forms/</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Sep 1996 23:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/5/securing-forms/</guid>
      <description>There are now many HTML FORMs in use in libraries of all types. These forms are usually the front ends to Common Gateway Interface (CGI) programs that implement such things as webopacs, electronic ILL requests and access to backend databases. Often these FORMs have to be authenticated to ensure that only valid library users can make use of the services. Web browsers and servers offer a number of a facilities for doing this authentication, each with different benefits and problems.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>Wire: Email Interview with Chris Lilley</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/2/wire/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Mar 1996 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/2/wire/</guid>
      <description>I represent JISC at the Advisory Council meetings of the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C). Most of the delegates are representing commercial companies, wheras I am effectively representing the UK Higher Education sector! W3C member companies are given advance information in confidence, and I am currently working with W3C to see how I can involve UK HE in the work of W3C without violating that confidence. This position is funded through the Advisory Group on Computer Graphics (AGOCG) and covers 25% of my time.</description>
    </item>
    
  </channel>
</rss>