<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Scorm on Ariadne</title>
    <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/buzz/scorm/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Scorm on Ariadne</description>
    <generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator>
    <language>en-gb</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    
	<atom:link href="http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/buzz/scorm/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    
    
    <item>
      <title>The Future of Interoperability and Standards in Education: A JISC CETIS Event</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/62/cetis-stds-2010-rpt/</link>
      <pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/62/cetis-stds-2010-rpt/</guid>
      <description>The stated intention of this working meeting organised by JISC CETIS, and held at the University of Bolton, UK, on 12 January 2010 was to:
&#39;[...] bring together participants in a range of standards organisations and communities to look at the future for interoperability standards in the education sector. The key topic for consideration is the relationship between specifications developed in informal communities and formal standards organisations and industry consortia. The meeting will also seek to explore the role of informal specification communities in rapidly developing, implementing and testing specifications in an open process before submission to more formal, possibly closed, standards bodies.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>Metadata for Learning Resources: An Update on Standards Activity for 2008</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/55/currier/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 23:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/55/currier/</guid>
      <description>In 2002 the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) published the IEEE Learning Object Metadata standard (IEEE LOM) [1], superseding the IMS Learning Resource Meta-data specification [2], which had been developed and used through several versions since the mid-1990s.
Over the same general period, the Dublin Core Metadata Initiative (DCMI) had established the Dublin Core (DC) as a standard for describing all kinds of web-based resources [3]. The Dublin Core Education Working Group [4] emerged as one of several special interest groups [5] developing specific metadata elements [6] for the use of their communities.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>e-Books for the Future: Here but Hiding?</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/49/whalley/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Oct 2006 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/49/whalley/</guid>
      <description>Although they were not called e-books at the time, Michael Hart&amp;rsquo;s Project Gutenberg started digitising existing print on paper editions for public access in the 1970s. Since then, the term e-book has come to have a variety of meanings and related concepts. Here I want to explore the direction associated with my day job as a researcher and teacher within the UK Higher Education system. My viewpoint may thus be somewhat idiosyncratic compared to Ariadne&amp;rsquo;s normal clientele but I am particularly interested in the information technologist&amp;rsquo;s role as an intermediary between academic author and student reader.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>What Do Application Profiles Reveal about the Learning Object Metadata Standard?</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/41/godby/</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2004 23:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/41/godby/</guid>
      <description>A Metadata Standard for Learning ObjectsAs learning objects grow in number and importance, institutions are faced with the daunting task of managing them. Like familiar items in library collections, learning objects need to be organised by subject and registered in searchable repositories. But they also introduce special problems. As computer files, they are dependent on a particular hardware and software environment. And as materials with a pedagogical intent, they are associated with metrics such as learning objectives, reading levels and methods for evaluating student performance.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>ERPANET Seminar on Persistent Identifiers</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/40/erpanet-ids-rpt/</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2004 23:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/40/erpanet-ids-rpt/</guid>
      <description>Day OneIntroductionWelcome and KeynoteOverview of Persistent Identifier initiativesURNOpenURL - The Rough GuideInfo URIsThe DCMI Persistent Identifier Working GroupThe CENDI ReportARKPURLsOverview of the Handle SystemDOIDay TwoIdentifiers at the Coal FaceEPICURThe National Digital Data Archive (NDA)NBN:URN Generator and ResolverDIVAThe Publisher&amp;rsquo;s PerspectiveDigital Object Identifiers for Publishing and the e-Learning CommunitiesPublication and Citation of Scientific and Primary DataInformation and the Government of CanadaConclusion
This event, organised by ERPANET [1], brought together around 40 key players with an interest in the topic of persistent identifiers in order to synthesize the current state of play, debate the issues and consider what lies on the horizon in this field of activity.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>RDN/LTSN Partnerships: Learning Resource Discovery Based on the LOM and the OAI-PMH</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/39/powell/</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Apr 2004 23:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/39/powell/</guid>
      <description>Over the last eighteen months or so, the UK Joint Information Systems Committee (JISC) has been funding some collaborative work between the Resource Discovery Network (RDN) Hubs [1] and Learning and Teaching Support Network (LTSN) Centres [2]. The primary intention of these subject-based RDN/LTSN partnerships was to:
Develop collection policies that clarified the relationships between the two sets of activities.Enable the sharing of records within and beyond partnerships using the Open Archives Initiative Protocol for Metadata Harvesting (OAI-PMH) [3].</description>
    </item>
    
  </channel>
</rss>