<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Technorati on Ariadne</title>
    <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/buzz/technorati/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Technorati on Ariadne</description>
    <generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator>
    <language>en-gb</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Jul 2013 23:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    
	<atom:link href="http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/buzz/technorati/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    
    
    <item>
      <title>Engaging Researchers with Social Media Tools: 25 Research Things@Huddersfield</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/71/stone-collins/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jul 2013 23:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/71/stone-collins/</guid>
      <description>This article explores whether an online learning course can help academic researchers to become more familiar with social media tools, and seeks to understand how they can put them to use within their research and teaching activities. It does so by considering the development, implementation and evaluation of a pilot Web 2.0 course, 25 Research Things, an innovative online learning programme developed at the University of Huddersfield, which gives researchers a structured way to engage with selected Web 2.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>Editorial Introduction to Issue 61: The Double-edged Web</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/61/editorial/</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/61/editorial/</guid>
      <description>Perhaps one of the current benchmarks for gauging when a Web technology has migrated from the cluttered desks of the technorati to the dining tables of the chatterati is if it becomes a topic for BBC Radio 4&#39;s The Moral Maze [1]. More accustomed to discussing matters such as child-rearing or a controversial pronouncement of the Archbishop of Canterbury, the panel members who, over the years have ranged from the liberal to the harrumphing illiberal (and in one case, both at the same time), recently did battle over Twitter [2].</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>Collaborative and Social Tagging Networks</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/54/tonkin-et-al/</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/54/tonkin-et-al/</guid>
      <description>Social tagging, which is also known as collaborative tagging, social classification, and social indexing, allows ordinary users to assign keywords, or tags, to items. Typically these items are Web-based resources and the tags become immediately available for others to see and use. Unlike traditional classification, social tagging keywords are typically freely chosen instead of using a controlled vocabulary. Social tagging is of interest to researchers because it is possible that with a sufficiently large number of tags, useful folksonomies will emerge that can either augment or even replace traditional ontologies.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>Human-powered Search Engines: An Overview and Roundup</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/54/search-engines/</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/54/search-engines/</guid>
      <description>&amp;lsquo;Human-powered search engines&amp;rsquo; is perhaps a slightly unfortunate term, since it makes me think of lots of people running around on treadmills providing the energy to keep the servers powered up! However, it&amp;rsquo;s the term in general use, so we&amp;rsquo;ll go with it. Essentially it means a search engine which can, and will have its results (or at least the position of its results) affected by human intervention, usually by people rating individual results further up or further down the rankings.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>IWMW 2007: Next Steps for the Web Management Community</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/52/iwmw-2007-rpt/</link>
      <pubDate>Sun, 29 Jul 2007 23:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/52/iwmw-2007-rpt/</guid>
      <description>Torrential rain, thunder and lightening provided the backdrop to the Institutional Web Management Workshop [1], held this year at the University of York. Dramatic as they were, the conditions did not in any way dampen the enthusiasm of the delegates over the three days. The programme this year consisted of plenary sessions, discussion groups, parallel sessions and the famed social events. New this year was the IWMW Innovation Competition, where participants were invited to submit lightweight examples of innovative uses of Web technologies as well as the IWMW logo.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>OpenID: Decentralised Single Sign-on for the Web</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/51/powell-recordon/</link>
      <pubDate>Sun, 29 Apr 2007 23:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/51/powell-recordon/</guid>
      <description>OpenID [1][2] is a single sign-on system for the Internet which puts people in charge. OpenID is a user-centric technology which allows a person to have control over how their Identity is both managed and used online. By being decentralised there is no single server with which every OpenID-enabled service and every user must register. Rather, people make their own choice of OpenID Provider, the service that manages their OpenID.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>Search Engines: Is Google Building on Shaky Foundations?</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/49/search-engines/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Oct 2006 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/49/search-engines/</guid>
      <description>I&amp;rsquo;m sure that there must be some sort of wise old saying along the lines of &amp;lsquo;the loudest noise starts with the quietest whisper&amp;rsquo;. This is something that I&amp;rsquo;m experiencing a lot at the moment - as I spend time on the Internet, or teaching, or even just talking to people I&amp;rsquo;m beginning to hear a little whisper along the lines of &amp;lsquo;What&amp;rsquo;s up with Google these days?&amp;rsquo; This is not a line from the experts - it&amp;rsquo;s just ordinary people who are beginning to wonder if Google is&amp;hellip; well - running out of steam.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>Web 2.0: Building the New Library</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/45/miller/</link>
      <pubDate>Sat, 29 Oct 2005 23:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/45/miller/</guid>
      <description>&#39;Web 2.0&#39; is a hot story out on the blogosphere right now, with an army of advocates facing off against those who argue that it is nothing new, and their allies with painful memories of Dot Com hysteria in the 1990s. Even respectable media outlets such as Business Week are getting excited, and an expensive conference in San Francisco at the start of October had to turn people away as it passed over 800 registrations.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>Opening Up OpenURLs with Autodiscovery</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/43/chudnov/</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2005 23:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/43/chudnov/</guid>
      <description>Library users have never before had so many options for finding, collecting and sharing information. Many users abandon old information management tools whenever new tools are easier, faster, more comprehensive, more intuitive, or simply &#39;cooler.&#39; Many successful new tools adhere to a principle of simplicity - HTML made it simple for anyone to publish on the Web; XML made it simple for anyone to exchange more strictly defined data; and RSS made it simple to extract and repurpose information from any kind of published resource [1].</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>Towards Library Groupware With Personalised Link Routing</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/40/chudnov/</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2004 23:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/40/chudnov/</guid>
      <description>&#39;Library groupware&#39; - a set of networked tools supporting information management for individuals and for distributed groups - is a new class of service we may choose to provide in our libraries. In its simplest form, library groupware would help people manage information as they move through the diversity of online resources and online communities that make up today&#39;s information landscape. Complex implementations might integrate equally well with enterprise-wide systems such as courseware and portals on a university campus, and desktop file storage on private individual computers.</description>
    </item>
    
  </channel>
</rss>