<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Uri on Ariadne</title>
    <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/buzz/uri/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Uri on Ariadne</description>
    <generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator>
    <language>en-gb</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    
	<atom:link href="http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/buzz/uri/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    
    
    <item>
      <title>LinkedUp: Linking Open Data for Education</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/72/guy-et-al/</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/72/guy-et-al/</guid>
      <description>In the past, discussions around Open Education have tended to focus on content and primarily Open Educational Resources (OER), freely accessible, openly licensed resources that are used for teaching, learning, assessment and research purposes. However Open Education is a complex beast made up of many aspects, of which the opening up of data is one important element.
When one mentions open data in education a multitude of questions arise: from the technical (what is open data?</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>DataFinder: A Research Data Catalogue for Oxford</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/71/rumsey-jefferies/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jul 2013 23:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/71/rumsey-jefferies/</guid>
      <description>In 2012 the University of Oxford Research Committee endorsed a university ‘Policy on the management of research data and records’ [1]. Much of the infrastructure to support this policy is being developed under the Jisc-funded Damaro Project [2]. The nascent services that underpin the University’s RDM (research data management) infrastructure have been divided into four themes:
RDM planning;managing live data;discovery and location; andaccess, reuse and curation.The data outputs catalogue falls into the third theme, and will result in metadata and interfaces that support discovery, location, citation and business reporting for Oxford research datasets.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>Improving Evaluation of Resources through Injected Feedback Surveys</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/71/reese/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jul 2013 23:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/71/reese/</guid>
      <description>Assessment of electronic resources has long proven a difficult challenge for librarians when looking to make collection development decisions.&amp;nbsp; Often, these decisions are made by looking at usage statistics provided by the vendor, and through informal conversations with selected faculty within affected disciplines.&amp;nbsp; The ability to capture point-of-use information from users remains a significant challenge for many institutions.&amp;nbsp; The purpose of this paper will be to suggest a novel approach to providing intercept survey functionality for librarians looking to simplify the gathering of user feedback for library provided materials.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>21st-century Scholarship and Wikipedia</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/70/thomas/</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/70/thomas/</guid>
      <description>Wikipedia, the world’s fifth most-used Web site [1], is a good illustration of the growing credibility of online resources. In his article in Ariadne earlier this year, “Wikipedia: Reflections on Use and Academic Acceptance” [2], Brian Whalley described the debates around accuracy and review, in the context of geology. He concluded that ‘If Wikipedia is the first port of call, as it already seems to be, for information requirement traffic, then there is a commitment to build on Open Educational Resources (OERs) of various kinds and improve their quality.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>EMTACL12 (Emerging Technologies in Academic Libraries)</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/70/emtacl12-rpt/</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/70/emtacl12-rpt/</guid>
      <description>The three-day conference consisted of eight keynote presentations by invited speakers and a number of parallel sessions. The main themes set out for this year’s conference were supporting research, organisational change within the library, linked open data and other semantic web applications in the library, new literacies, and new services/old services in new clothes, along with other relevant perspectives on emerging technologies.
We attended the conference to gain an overview of organisational changes happening across the sector in relation to technological developments and to gather opinion on the relevance of the academic library within a digital society.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>Motivations for the Development of a Web Resource Synchronisation Framework</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/70/lewis-et-al/</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/70/lewis-et-al/</guid>
      <description>This article describes the motivations behind the development of the ResourceSync Framework. The Framework addresses the need to synchronise resources between Web sites. &amp;nbsp;Resources cover a wide spectrum of types, such as metadata, digital objects, Web pages, or data files. &amp;nbsp;There are many scenarios in which the ability to perform some form of synchronisation is required. Examples include aggregators such as Europeana that want to harvest and aggregate collections of resources, or preservation services that wish to archive Web sites as they change.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>Online Information 2012</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/70/online-2012-rpt/</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/70/online-2012-rpt/</guid>
      <description>Online Information [1] is an interesting conference as it brings together information professionals from both the public and the private sector. The opportunity to share experiences from these differing perspectives doesn’t happen that often and brings real benefits, such as highly productive networking. This year’s Online Information, held between 20 - 21 &amp;nbsp;November, felt like a slightly different event to previous years. The conference had condensed down to 2 days from 3, dropped its exhibition and free workshops and found a new home at the Victoria Park Plaza Hotel, London.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>The LIPARM Project: A New Approach to Parliamentary Metadata</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/70/gartner/</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/70/gartner/</guid>
      <description>Parliamentary historians in the United Kingdom are particularly fortunate as their key primary source, the record of Parliamentary proceedings, is almost entirely available in digitised form. Similarly, those needing to consult and study contemporary proceedings as scholars, journalists or citizens have access to the daily output of the UK&#39;s Parliaments and Assemblies in electronic form shortly after their proceedings take place.
Unfortunately, the full potential of this resource for all of these users is limited by the fact that it is scattered throughout a heterogeneous information landscape and so cannot be approached as a unitary resource.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>Data Citation and Publication by NERC’s Environmental Data Centres</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/68/callaghan-et-al/</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/68/callaghan-et-al/</guid>
      <description>Data are the foundation upon which scientific progress rests. Historically speaking, data were a scarce resource, but one which was (relatively) easy to publish in hard copy, as tables or graphs in journal papers. With modern scientific methods, and the increased ease in collecting and analysing vast quantities of data, there arises a corresponding difficulty in publishing this data in a form that can be considered part of the scientific record.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>The Future of the Past of the Web</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/68/fpw11-rpt/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/68/fpw11-rpt/</guid>
      <description>We have all heard at least some of the extraordinary statistics that attempt to capture the sheer size and ephemeral nature of the Web. According to the Digital Preservation Coalition (DPC), more than 70 new domains are registered and more than 500,000 documents are added to the Web every minute [1]. This scale, coupled with its ever-evolving use, present significant challenges to those concerned with preserving both the content and context of the Web.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>Never Waste a Good Crisis: Innovation and Technology in Institutions</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/66/cetis-2010-rpt/</link>
      <pubDate>Sun, 30 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/66/cetis-2010-rpt/</guid>
      <description>&#39;I get a feeling that we are on a...&#39; [The hands make a gesture to show the stern of a sinking ship].
The Monty Phytonesque images on my inner eye from the title of the CETIS 2010 Conference fade and the jolly music of the ship&#39;s band starts chiming in my inner ear as I see them move towards the forward half of the boat deck. The CETIS conference is always an upbeat event, even when the prospects for higher education in UK at the moment are not that bright.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>Editorial Introduction to Issue 65: Ariadne in Search of Your Views</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/65/editorial/</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2010 23:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/65/editorial/</guid>
      <description>You may have already noted in the editorial section of this issue a link to the Reader Survey which I ask you seriously to consider completing, whether you are a frequent Ariadne reader or are reading the Magazine for the first time. Moves are afoot to give Ariadne some effort towards improvements in your experience of the publication and I cannot emphasise enough the value I place on suggestions and comments from you.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>Repository Fringe 2010</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/65/repos-fringe-2010-rpt/</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2010 23:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/65/repos-fringe-2010-rpt/</guid>
      <description>2010 was the third year of Repository Fringe, and slightly more formally organised than its antecedents, with an increased number of discursive presentations and less in the way of organised chaos! The proceedings began on Wednesday 1 September with a one-day, pre-event SHERPA/RoMEO API Workshop [1] run by the Repositories Support Project team.
2 September 2010Opening the event proper on Thursday morning, Sheila Cannell, Director of Library Services, University of Edinburgh, used the imminent Edinburgh festival fireworks as a metaphor for the repository development endeavour.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>What Is a URI and Why Does It Matter?</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/65/thompson-hs/</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2010 23:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/65/thompson-hs/</guid>
      <description>URI stands for Uniform Resource Identifier, the official name for those things you see all the time on the Web that begin &#39;http:&#39; or &#39;mailto:&#39;, for example http://www.w3.org/, which is the URI for the home page of the World Wide Web Consortium [1]. (These things were called URLs (Uniform Resource Locators) in the early days of the Web, and the change from URL to URI is either hugely significant or completely irrelevant, depending on who is talking—I have nothing to say about this issue in this article.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>Repository Software Comparison: Building Digital Library Infrastructure at LSE</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/64/fay/</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 23:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/64/fay/</guid>
      <description>Digital collections at LSE (London School of Economics and Political Science)[1] are significant and growing, as are the requirements of their users. LSE Library collects materials relevant to research and teaching in the social sciences, crossing the boundaries between personal and organisational archives, rare and unique printed collections and institutional research outputs. Digital preservation is an increasing concern alongside our commitment to continue to develop innovative digital services for researchers and students.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>Abstract Modelling of Digital Identifiers</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/62/nicholas-et-al/</link>
      <pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/62/nicholas-et-al/</guid>
      <description>Discussion of digital identifiers, and persistent identifiers in particular, has often been confused by differences in underlying assumptions and approaches. To bring more clarity to such discussions, the PILIN Project has devised an abstract model of identifiers and identifier services, which is presented here in summary. Given such an abstract model, it is possible to compare different identifier schemes, despite variations in terminology; and policies and strategies can be formulated for persistence without committing to particular systems.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>Moving Targets: Web Preservation and Reference Management</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/62/davis/</link>
      <pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/62/davis/</guid>
      <description>It seems fair to say that the lion&amp;rsquo;s share of work on developing online tools for reference and citation management by students and researchers has focused on familiar types of publication. They generally comprise resources that can be neatly and discretely bound in the covers of a book or journal, or their electronic analogues, like the Portable Document Format (PDF): objects in established library or database systems, with ISBNs and ISSNs underwritten by the authority of formal publication and legal deposit.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>Towards a Toolkit for Implementing Application Profiles</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/62/chaudhri-et-al/</link>
      <pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/62/chaudhri-et-al/</guid>
      <description>The development of the Dublin Core Application Profiles (DCAPs) has been closely focussed on the construction of metadata standards targeted at specific resource types, on the implicit assumption that such a metadata solution would be immediately and usefully implementable in software environments that deal with such resources. The success of an application profile would thus be an inevitable consequence of correctly describing the generalised characteristics of those resources. Yet despite the earlier success of application profiles, more recent growth in usage of the DCAPs funded by the Joint Information Systems Committee (JISC) has been slow by comparison [1].</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>Enhancing Scientific Communication through Aggregated Publications</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/61/hogenaar/</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/61/hogenaar/</guid>
      <description>The Internet has caused a revolution in the way scientists and scholars have access to scholarly output. Only 15 years ago, the (university) library decided what sources should be offered to the staff and individual scientists could only hope the librarian would listen to their wishes. In this system scientists frequently had no instantaneous access to the information they wanted. In such instances they had to rely on the Interlibrary Loan System.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>Live Blogging @ IWMW 2009</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/61/iwmw-2009-rpt/</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/61/iwmw-2009-rpt/</guid>
      <description>The 12th annual Institutional Web Managers Workshop (IWMW) attracted nearly 200 delegates, making it the largest workshop in the event&#39;s history. Whilst the popularity of the physical event has grown, so too has the remote audience. So this year organisers Marieke Guy and Brian Kelly decided that it was time to start treating this remote audience as first class citizens.
That&#39;s where I came in. As live blogger, my job was to amplify IWMW 2009; providing a live commentary via Twitter on the dedicated @iwmwlive account, blogging on the IWMW 2009 blog [1], uploading video interviews and co-ordinating all the online resources via a NetVibes page [2] to give the remote audience a more complete experience of attending and to create a digital footprint for the proceedings, complementing the fantastic live video streaming provided by the University of Essex.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>Content Architecture: Exploiting and Managing Diverse Resources</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/60/isko-2009-rpt/</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 23:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/60/isko-2009-rpt/</guid>
      <description>I recently attended the first biennial Conference of the British Chapter of the International Society for Knowledge Organization (ISKO UK) [1] entitled &amp;lsquo;Content Architecture: Exploiting and Managing Diverse Resources&amp;rsquo;. It was organized in co-operation with the Department of Information Studies, University College London.
If the intention was to focus on the diversity of resources out there, I also felt that the audience was very diverse in terms of levels of expertise and perspectives.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>Book Review: Website Optimization</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/57/cliff-rvw/</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/57/cliff-rvw/</guid>
      <description>Serendipity can be a wonderful thing. It was a Tuesday, over coffee, that the esteemed editor of this publication presented me with a copy of Website Optimization and asked if I would be interested in reviewing it. Two days later, at a regular team meeting for the Repositories Support Project 1, we discussed (rather generally) how we might boost the search ranking and usage of the RSP Web site. Marvellous, an interesting book to review and a real life problem to which to apply to it.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>Get Tooled Up: SeeAlso: A Simple Linkserver Protocol</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/57/voss/</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/57/voss/</guid>
      <description>In recent years the principle of Service-oriented Architecture (SOA) has grown increasingly important in digital library systems. More and more core functionalities are becoming available in the form of Web-based, standardised services which can be combined dynamically to operate across a broader environment [1]. Standard APIs for searching (SRU [2] [3], OpenSearch [4]), harvesting and syndication (OAI-OMH [5], ATOM [6]), copying (unAPI [7] [8]), publishing, editing (AtomPub [9], Jangle [10], SRU Update [11]), and more basic library operations, either already exist or are being developed.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>News and Events</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/57/newsline/</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/57/newsline/</guid>
      <description>TASI Courses for Remainder of 2008TASI (the JISC Advisory Service for still images, moving images and sound) has a few places left on its autumn/winter training programme. http://www.tasi.ac.uk/training/training.html
14 November 2008 Optimising your Images using Adobe Photoshop21 November 2008 Introduction to Image Metadata27 November 2008 Essential Techniques in Digital Image Capture28 November 2008 Advanced Techniques in Digital Image Capture03 December 2008 Digital Photography - Taking Control of your SLR11 December 2008 Scanning with the CLA Licence12 December 2008 Copyright and Digital ImagesThe following newly released course has just been added to the programme:</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>OAI-ORE, PRESERV2 and Digital Preservation</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/57/rumsey-osteen/</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/57/rumsey-osteen/</guid>
      <description>The new framework for the description and exchange of aggregations of Web resources, OAI-ORE, had its European release in April 2008 [1]. Amongst its practical uses, OAI-ORE has a role to play in digital preservation and continued access to files. This article describes the basic outline of the framework and how it can support the PRESERV2 project digital preservation model of provision of preservation services and interoperability for digital repositories. The PRESERV approach recognises that effective preservation is founded on three fundamental actions on data: copy, move and monitor.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>Persistent Identifiers: Considering the Options</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/56/tonkin/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 23:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/56/tonkin/</guid>
      <description>What Is a Persistent Identifier, and Why?Persistent identifiers (PIs) are simply maintainable identifiers that allow us to refer to a digital object – a file or set of files, such as an e-print (article, paper or report), an image or an installation file for a piece of software. The only interesting persistent identifiers are also persistently actionable (that is, you can &amp;ldquo;click&amp;rdquo; them); however, unlike a simple hyperlink, persistent identifiers are supposed to continue to provide access to the resource, even when it moves to other servers or even to other organisations.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>The Networked Library Service Layer: Sharing Data for More Effective Management and Cooperation</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/56/gatenby/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 23:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/56/gatenby/</guid>
      <description>Libraries&amp;rsquo; collections fall into three parts: physical, digital and licensed. These are managed by multiple systems, ILS (Integrated Library System), ERM (Electronic Records Management), digital management, digital repositories, resolvers, inter-library loan and reference. At the same time libraries are increasingly co-operating in collecting and storing resources. This article examines how to identify data that is best located at global, collective and local levels. An example is explored, namely the benefits of moving data from different local systems to the network level to manage acquisition of the total collection as a whole and in combination with consortia members.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>Versioning in Repositories: Implementing Best Practice</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/56/brace/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 23:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/56/brace/</guid>
      <description>The VIF ProjectThe Version Identification Framework (VIF) [1] Project ran between July 2007 and May 2008 and was funded by the Joint Information Systems Committee, (JISC) under the Repositories and Preservation Programme [2] in order to help develop versioning best practice in repositories.
The project was run by partners, the London School of Economics and Political Science (LSE) [3], the Science and Technology Facilities Council (STFC) [4], the University of Leeds [5] and Erasmus University Rotterdam [6].</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>Metadata for Learning Resources: An Update on Standards Activity for 2008</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/55/currier/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 23:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/55/currier/</guid>
      <description>In 2002 the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) published the IEEE Learning Object Metadata standard (IEEE LOM) [1], superseding the IMS Learning Resource Meta-data specification [2], which had been developed and used through several versions since the mid-1990s.
Over the same general period, the Dublin Core Metadata Initiative (DCMI) had established the Dublin Core (DC) as a standard for describing all kinds of web-based resources [3]. The Dublin Core Education Working Group [4] emerged as one of several special interest groups [5] developing specific metadata elements [6] for the use of their communities.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>Towards an Application Profile for Images</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/55/eadie/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 23:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/55/eadie/</guid>
      <description>Following on from the project to develop an application profile for scholarly works (SWAP)[1], the Joint Information Systems Committee (JISC) has recently funded through its Repositories and Preservation Programme, a series of projects to establish Application Profiles in the areas of images, time-based media, geospatial data and learning objects [2].
The work on the Images Application Profile (IAP) has been carried out for the six-month period from September 2007 to March 2008, and while the substantive project work is now complete and a draft Images Application Profile is in circulation, the ongoing job of promoting the profile to, and consulting with, the image, repository and metadata communities continues.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>The SPP Alerting Portlet: Delivering Personalised Updates</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/52/knight/</link>
      <pubDate>Sun, 29 Jul 2007 23:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/52/knight/</guid>
      <description>Background: Identifying a Need SPP phase I [1] was largely devoted to considering how five Resource Discovery Network (RDN) hubs might be turned into subject portals, but at this stage did not include the development of portlets. During the course of phase I it became clear that many potential users of these portals would choose to access content from within their local institutional portal or a virtual learning environment (VLE). The choice of functionality for these portlets was in part determined by the results of user testing on users of the BIOME Web site, which gathered feedback about various potential portlets and the ways in which they might deliver information [2].</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>Editorial Introduction to Issue 51: Democratising Cultural Heritage</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/51/editorial/</link>
      <pubDate>Sun, 29 Apr 2007 23:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/51/editorial/</guid>
      <description>Having emerged from the political arguments of the 1990s about what culture could be funded and whether it was better to fund soccer or opera, we have moved into an age where, in the UK at least, there are arguments as to what actually constitutes British culture. Fortunately more people are deciding to do culture for themselves than remain passive witnesses to the pundits&#39; debate. The place where they are doing it is online and they are not waiting to see whether their offering attracts the experts&#39; approval - and sometimes, admittedly, one might argue more&#39;s the pity.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>The W3C Technical Architecture Group</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/51/thompson/</link>
      <pubDate>Sun, 29 Apr 2007 23:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/51/thompson/</guid>
      <description>Background: The W3C and Its Process The World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) was set up by Tim Berners-Lee in 1994 to preserve and enhance the public utility of the Web for everyone, to &amp;ldquo;lead the Web to its full potential&amp;rdquo;. It is a consortium of industrial and institutional members (around 450 at the time of writing) who pay on a sliding scale proportional to size. It produces Recommendations which are widely recognised as de facto standards.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>A Dublin Core Application Profile for Scholarly Works</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/50/allinson-et-al/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/50/allinson-et-al/</guid>
      <description>In May 2006, the Joint Information Systems Committee (JISC) [1] approached UKOLN [2] and the Eduserv Foundation [3] to collaborate on the development of a metadata specification for describing eprints (alternatively referred to as scholarly works, research papers or scholarly research texts) [4]. A Dublin Core (DC) [5] application profile was chosen as the basis of the specification given the widespread use of DC in existing repositories, the flexibility and extensibility of the DCMI Abstract Model [6] and its compatibility with the Semantic Web [7].</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>Fedora Users Conference</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/48/fedora-users-rpt/</link>
      <pubDate>Sat, 29 Jul 2006 23:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/48/fedora-users-rpt/</guid>
      <description>The Fedora Users Conference 2006, for users of the open source Fedora repository system [1] was the second to be run under the auspices of the core Fedora development team, following an initial conference at Rutgers University in June 2005. It is, though, one among a collection of conferences and meetings that have taken place over the past year based on using Fedora, with venues as diverse as Copenhagen, Aberystwyth, Sydney, and Hull.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>Introducing UnAPI</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/48/chudnov-et-al/</link>
      <pubDate>Sat, 29 Jul 2006 23:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/48/chudnov-et-al/</guid>
      <description>Common Web tools and techniques cannot easily manipulate library resources. While photo sharing, link logging, and Web logging sites make it easy to use and reuse content, barriers still exist that limit the reuse of library resources within new Web services. [1][2] To support the reuse of library information in Web 2.0-style services, we need to allow many types of applications to connect with our information resources more easily. One such connection is a universal method to copy any resource of interest.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>News and Events</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/48/newsline/</link>
      <pubDate>Sat, 29 Jul 2006 23:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/48/newsline/</guid>
      <description>UKeiG Training: Developing and managing e-book collectionsThe UK eInformation Group (UKeiG), in co-operation with Academic and National Library Training Co-operative (ANLTC), are pleased to present a course entitled &#39;Developing and managing e-book collections&#39;, to be held in Training Room 1, The Library, Dublin City University, Dublin 9 on Tuesday, 12 September 2006 from 9.30a.m. to 4.30p.m.
Course OutlineThis course opens the door to a new electronic format. In the last six years, there has been an unprecedented growth in the publishing of e-books with an increasing array of different types available for all sectors.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>Folksonomies: The Fall and Rise of Plain-text Tagging</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/47/tonkin/</link>
      <pubDate>Sat, 29 Apr 2006 23:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/47/tonkin/</guid>
      <description>Despite the stability of many key technologies underlying today&#39;s Internet, venerable workhorses such as TCP/IP and HTTP, the rise of new candidate specifications frequently leads to a sort of collaborative manic depression. Every now and then, a new idea comes along and sparks a wave of interest, the first stage in the Internet hype cycle. Transformed with the addition of a series of relatively content-free conceptual buzzwords, the fragile idea is transmitted between and within communities until disillusionment sets in, when the terminology becomes an out-of-date reminder of a slightly embarrassing era that tomorrow&#39;s computer industry professionals will laugh about over a pint of beer.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>The Second Digital Repositories Programme Meeting</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/47/jisc-repositories-rpt/</link>
      <pubDate>Sat, 29 Apr 2006 23:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/47/jisc-repositories-rpt/</guid>
      <description>The JISC (Joint Information Systems Committee) Digital Repositories Programme [1] held its second Programme meeting towards the end of March. Following in the collaborative tradition set by last October&#39;s joint Programme meeting with the Digital Preservation and Asset Management Programme [2], this gathering was themed around the cluster groups established by the Digital Repositories Programme [3] and included many guests from other JISC areas of work and beyond. These clusters seek to encompass many of the diverse issues being considered across the Digital Repositories Programme, including the different repository types (e-Learning and Scientific data), the infrastructural and technical issues (Integrating infrastructure and Machine services) and the social, cultural and legal topics (Legal and policy, Personal resource management strategies and Preservation).</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>Joint Workshop on Future-proofing Institutional Websites</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/46/dcc-fpw-rpt/</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2006 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/46/dcc-fpw-rpt/</guid>
      <description>This DCC [1] and Wellcome Library [2] workshop sought to provide insight into ways that content creators and curators can ensure ongoing access to reliable Web sites over time. The issue is not merely one of archiving; it is also about designing and managing a Web site so that it is suitable for long-term preservation with minimum intervention by curators to ensure the content remains reliable and understandable through time.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>DC 2005</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/45/dc-2005-rpt/</link>
      <pubDate>Sat, 29 Oct 2005 23:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/45/dc-2005-rpt/</guid>
      <description>This year&#39;s DC Conference took place over four days in the excellent facilities of the University of Carlos III in Leganes, which is a few minutes train ride south of Madrid in Spain. In excess of two hundred people attended coming from 34 countries around the world. As always it was a busy conference with many parallel strands to choose between. The rest of this report therefore covers only a fraction of all the papers and work that happened there: it is a fairly personal selection drawn from some of the sessions I attended.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>Web 2.0: Building the New Library</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/45/miller/</link>
      <pubDate>Sat, 29 Oct 2005 23:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/45/miller/</guid>
      <description>&#39;Web 2.0&#39; is a hot story out on the blogosphere right now, with an army of advocates facing off against those who argue that it is nothing new, and their allies with painful memories of Dot Com hysteria in the 1990s. Even respectable media outlets such as Business Week are getting excited, and an expensive conference in San Francisco at the start of October had to turn people away as it passed over 800 registrations.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>DCC Workshop on Persistent Identifiers</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/44/dcc-pi-rpt/</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2005 23:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/44/dcc-pi-rpt/</guid>
      <description>A Digital Curation Centre (DCC) Meeting on Persistent Identifiers was held over 30 June - 1 July 2005 at the Wolfson Building at the University of Glasgow. This is a new construction (2002) just opposite the 1970s Boyd-Orr building, mentioned before in Ariadne&#39;s pages. The architecture of this building is quite unlike the Boyd-Orr building however, being light and airy, with more imaginative use of space: the lecture theatre in which the meeting took place is in the shape of an eye, situated at the edge of the main open space.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>How the Use of Standards Is Transforming Australian Digital Libraries</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/41/campbell/</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2004 23:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/41/campbell/</guid>
      <description>The National Library of Australia (NLA) has been able to achieve new business practices such as digitising its collections and hosting federated search services by exploiting recent standards including the Open Archives Initiative Protocol for Metadata Harvesting (OAI-PMH), handles for persistent identification, and metadata schemas for new types of content. Each instantiation of the OAI-PMH opens up new ways of creating and managing our digital libraries while making them more accessible for learning, teaching and research purposes.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>Web Focus: QA Focus Has Finished - Let&#39;s Start Embedding QA</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/41/web-focus/</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2004 23:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/41/web-focus/</guid>
      <description>About QA FocusThe JISC-funded QA Focus Project officially finished on 31 July 2004. The project, which started on 1 January 2002, supported JISC&amp;rsquo;s digital library programmes. QA Focus developed a quality assurance (QA) framework which could be used by projects funded by JISC&amp;rsquo;s Information Environment programmes to ensure that project deliverables were functional, widely accessible and interoperable. The quality assurance framework was supported by a wide range of briefing documents which provided brief, focussed advice on use of standards and best practices in a range of areas including selection of standards, digitisation, Web, metadata, software and service deployment.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>An Introduction to the Search/Retrieve URL Service (SRU)</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/40/morgan/</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2004 23:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/40/morgan/</guid>
      <description>This article is an introduction to the &#34;brother and sister&#34; Web Service protocols named Search/Retrieve Web Service (SRW) and Search/Retrieve URL Service (SRU) with an emphasis on the later. More specifically, the article outlines the problems SRW/U are intended to solve, the similarities and differences between SRW and SRU, the complimentary nature of the protocols with OAI-PMH, and how SRU is being employed in a sponsored NSF (National Science Foundation) grant called OCKHAM to facilitate an alerting service.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>ERPANET Seminar on Persistent Identifiers</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/40/erpanet-ids-rpt/</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2004 23:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/40/erpanet-ids-rpt/</guid>
      <description>Day OneIntroductionWelcome and KeynoteOverview of Persistent Identifier initiativesURNOpenURL - The Rough GuideInfo URIsThe DCMI Persistent Identifier Working GroupThe CENDI ReportARKPURLsOverview of the Handle SystemDOIDay TwoIdentifiers at the Coal FaceEPICURThe National Digital Data Archive (NDA)NBN:URN Generator and ResolverDIVAThe Publisher&amp;rsquo;s PerspectiveDigital Object Identifiers for Publishing and the e-Learning CommunitiesPublication and Citation of Scientific and Primary DataInformation and the Government of CanadaConclusion
This event, organised by ERPANET [1], brought together around 40 key players with an interest in the topic of persistent identifiers in order to synthesize the current state of play, debate the issues and consider what lies on the horizon in this field of activity.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>World Wide Web Conference 2004</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/40/www2004-rpt/</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2004 23:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/40/www2004-rpt/</guid>
      <description>WWW2004 [1] was the 13th conference in the series of international World Wide Web conferences organised by the IW3C2 (International World Wide Web Conference Committee). This was the annual gathering of Web researchers and technologists to present the latest work on the Web and Web standardisation at the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C).
This conference is very much a networking event in both the technical and personal sense. For the last 3 years it has had pervasive wireless networking (&#39;wi-fi&#39;) available, allowing interaction with the sessions and the speakers during the conference.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>RDN/LTSN Partnerships: Learning Resource Discovery Based on the LOM and the OAI-PMH</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/39/powell/</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Apr 2004 23:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/39/powell/</guid>
      <description>Over the last eighteen months or so, the UK Joint Information Systems Committee (JISC) has been funding some collaborative work between the Resource Discovery Network (RDN) Hubs [1] and Learning and Teaching Support Network (LTSN) Centres [2]. The primary intention of these subject-based RDN/LTSN partnerships was to:
Develop collection policies that clarified the relationships between the two sets of activities.Enable the sharing of records within and beyond partnerships using the Open Archives Initiative Protocol for Metadata Harvesting (OAI-PMH) [3].</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>Public Libraries: 2003, 2004: A Backward Glance and Thoughts on the Future</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/38/public-libraries/</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2004 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/38/public-libraries/</guid>
      <description>Spam, privacy and the lawAnother year gone and the millennium celebrations and Y2K bug already seem to belong to some dim and distant technological past.
As 2003 drew to a close the spotlight was on the use and abuse of Information Technology: never was so much havoc caused by so few. The language employed by the media to describe events in the online world reflected global concerns about warfare and disease.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>Delivering OAI Records As RSS: An IMesh Toolkit Module for Facilitating Resource Sharing</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/37/duke/</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2003 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/37/duke/</guid>
      <description>Subject Gateways act as a main point of access to high-quality resources on the Web. They are resource discovery guides that provide links to information resources which can be whole Web sites, organisational home pages and other collections or services, themed around a specific subject, such as the physical sciences or humanities. At their core is a catalogue of rich metadata records that describe Internet resources - subject specialists identify and select the resources and create the descriptions.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>Mapping the JISC IE Service Landscape</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/36/powell/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2003 23:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/36/powell/</guid>
      <description>This largely graphical article attempts to explain the JISC Information Environment (JISC IE) [1] by layering a set of fairly well-known services, projects and software applications over the network architecture diagram [2].
The JISC Information Environment (JISC IE) technical architecture specifies a set of standards and protocols that support the development and delivery of an integrated set of networked services that allow the end-user to discover, access, use and publish digital and physical resources as part of their learning and research activities.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>Metadata Wanted for the Evanescent Library</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/36/maccoll-rpt/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2003 23:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/36/maccoll-rpt/</guid>
      <description>This event was organised jointly by UKOLN and the National e-Science Centre (NESC) [1]. Liz Lyon, Director of UKOLN, gave the introduction, reminding us that this was the second UKOLN-NESC workshop. The first happened about a year ago, bringing together the digital library and Grid computing communities for the first time. The presentations were as follows:
Building a Semantic Infrastructure - David De RoureWhy Ontologies? - Jeremy RogersPublishing and Sharing Schemas - Rachel Heery and Pete JohnstonImplementing Ontologies in (my)Grid Environments - Carole GobleKnowledge Organisation Systems - Doug TudhopeConcluding Remarks - Carole GobleBuilding a Semantic InfrastructureIn his introductory talk, Building a Semantic Infrastructure, Professor David De Roure of the University of Southampton, provided a history lesson at a gallop on the Grid and the Semantic Web.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>The RoMEO Project: Protecting Metadata in an Open Access Environment</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/36/romeo/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2003 23:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/36/romeo/</guid>
      <description>The Open Archives Initiative&amp;rsquo;s Protocol for Metadata Harvesting (OAI-PMH) enables the &amp;lsquo;disclosure&amp;rsquo; of metadata by Data Providers and the harvesting of that metadata by Service Providers. Although there is nothing to stop commercial providers from utilising this open-source protocol [1], it has its roots in the open access community and as such is used by many open archives. These include subject-based archives such as ArXiv [2], CogPrints [3], and the increasing number of Institutional Repositories, many of which have been established as a result of funding via the UK JISC FAIR (Focus on Access to Institutional Repositories) programme [4].</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>eBank UK: Building the Links Between Research Data, Scholarly Communication and Learning</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/36/lyon/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2003 23:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/36/lyon/</guid>
      <description>This article presents some new digital library development activities which are predicated on the concept that research and learning processes are cyclical in nature, and that subsequent outputs which contribute to knowledge, are based on the continuous use and reuse of data and information [1]. We can start by examining the creation of original data, (which may be, for example, numerical data generated by an experiment or a survey, or alternatively images captured as part of a clinical study).</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>5 Step Guide to Becoming a Content Provider in the JISC Information Environment</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/33/info-environment/</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Oct 2002 23:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/33/info-environment/</guid>
      <description>This document provides a brief introduction to the JISC Information Environment (JISC-IE) [1], with a particular focus on the technical steps that content providers need to take in order to make their systems interoperable within the JISC-IE technical architecture. The architecture specifies a set of standards and protocols that support the development and delivery of an integrated set of networked services that allow the end-user to discover, access, use and publish digital and physical resources as part of their learning and research activities.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>The JISC Information Environment and Web Services</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/31/information-environments/</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2002 23:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/31/information-environments/</guid>
      <description>The JISC Information EnvironmentThe Distributed National Electronic Resource (DNER) [1] is a JISC-funded, managed, heterogeneous collection of information resources and services (bibliographic, full-text, image, video, geo-spatial, datasets, etc.) of particular value to the further and higher education communities. The JISC Information Environment (JISC IE) [2] is the set of networked services that allows people to discover, access, use and publish resources within the DNER. The JISC IE technical architecture [3] specifies the standards and protocols that provide interoperability between this network of services.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>Web Focus: Guidelines for URI Naming Policies</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/31/web-focus/</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2002 23:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/31/web-focus/</guid>
      <description>&amp;ldquo;Cool URIs&amp;rdquo;What are &amp;ldquo;cool URIs&amp;rdquo;? This term comes from advice provided by W3C (the World Wide Web Consortium). The paper &amp;ldquo;Cool URIs don&amp;rsquo;t change&amp;rdquo; [1] begins by saying:
What makes a cool URI?A cool URI is one which does not change.What sorts of URI change?URIs don&amp;rsquo;t change: people change them.All Web users will, sadly, be familiar with the 404 error message. But, as W3C point out, the 404 error message does not point to a technical failure but a human one - hence the warning: &amp;ldquo;URIs don&amp;rsquo;t change: people change them.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>Architects of the Information Age</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/29/miller/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2001 23:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/29/miller/</guid>
      <description>In July of this year, Interoperability Focus [1] organised a meeting at the Office of the e–Envoy [2], the Cabinet Office unit responsible for driving forward the UK&amp;rsquo;s e–Government initiatives.
Across an increasing number of initiatives and programmes, there is a growing recognition of the need for common &amp;lsquo;architectures&amp;rsquo; within which truly useful applications and services may be constructed.
Partly, these architectures form a philosophical basis within which developments may be undertaken.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>Web Focus: HTML is Dead!</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/27/web-focus/</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/27/web-focus/</guid>
      <description>HTML is Dead?Previous Web Focus articles have reported on developments which have been the featured prominently in International World Wide Web conferences. These include XML, which was the highlight of the Sixth WWW conference in 1997 [1].
Have developments such as this affected mainstream Web services, or are they restricted to the research community? Indeed, wouldn&amp;rsquo;t it be sensible for HTML authors for mainstream Web services to be still be making use of the same HTML tags (and possibly authoring tools) they mastered several years ago?</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>Metadata: I Am a Name and a Number</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/24/metadata/</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Jun 2000 23:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/24/metadata/</guid>
      <description>People, places, and things are identified in any number of different ways.
I, for example, have a National Insurance Number, a staff payroll number, several bank account numbers, and assorted frequent flyer programme membership numbers, all of which are the handles that certain groups of people use to identify me. I also have a name and, associated to me, three telephone numbers and at least two e-mail addresses. Neither telephone number nor e-mail address truly identifies me the person of course, but they might well be seen as equally useful a means of &#39;retrieving&#39; me as my name or any other associated identifier.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>Unix: What Is mod_perl?</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/21/unix/</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Sep 1999 23:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/21/unix/</guid>
      <description>mod_perl [1] has to be one of the most useful and powerful of the Apache modules. Beneath the inconspicuous name, this module marries two of the most successful and widely acclaimed products of OSS, the Apache Webserver [2] and Perl [3]. The result is a kind of Web developers Utopia, with Perl providing easy access to, and control of, the formidable Apache API. Powerful applications can be rapidly created and deployed as solutions to anything from an office Intranet to Enterprise level Web requirements.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>SEAMLESS: Introduction to the Project </title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/19/rowlatt/</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/19/rowlatt/</guid>
      <description>SEAMLESS  is a two year research project, funded by the British Library, which aims to develop a new model for citizens&amp;rsquo; information - one which is distributed, and based on partnerships and common standards.
The objectives of the SEAMLESS project are to:
build strong and sustainable partnerships between the various information providers operating in the regiondevelop and implement common standards (technical and informational) so as to achieve interoperability between their systems and datadevelop a SEAMLESS interface which will allow simultaneous querying of distributed information sources (whether stored in a database, made available on a website, or in word processed documents) and return all the information back to the user in a unified listfacilitate electronic communication between the information providers and their customers, and between the various participating agenciesdevelop a current awareness/alerting service for users (second phase)Currently the project team (Essex Libraries, Fretwell Downing Data Systems Ltd.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>Web Focus: Extending Your Browser</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/19/web-focus/</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/19/web-focus/</guid>
      <description>The WebWatch project [1], which was based at UKOLN, involved the development and use of a variety of tools to analyse web resources and web servers. During the early development of the software, individual summaries (particularly of outliers in the statistical data) were often required in order to check that the software was working correctly. Initially summaries were obtained using simple Unix scripts. For example the urlget script displayed the HTTP headers for a resource as illustrated below:</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>Web Editorial: Introduction to Issue 18</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/18/editorials/</link>
      <pubDate>Sat, 19 Dec 1998 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/18/editorials/</guid>
      <description>This is sadly the last of the parallel print and web publication of Ariadne - for the moment, at least. Ariadne will however continue as a web magazine. The print edition has finished in some style, with a publication twice the size of all earlier copies. Attendees at the eLib &#34;Information Ecologies&#34; conference in York earlier this month already know this, since we arranged for advance copies to be available for that event.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>What Is a URI?</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/18/what-is/</link>
      <pubDate>Sat, 19 Dec 1998 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/18/what-is/</guid>
      <description>Users of the Web are familiar with URLs, the Uniform Resource Locators. A URL is a locator for a network accessible resource. Such a locator can be considered an identifier for the resource that it refers to. Depending on the interpretation of identification, various different attributes of a resource could be considered as an identifier for that resource. However, what comprises a functional resource identifier depends upon the context in which that identifier will be used.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>RDF Seminar</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/15/events/stakis.html</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 May 1998 23:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/15/events/stakis.html</guid>
      <description>On the 8th May, following almost immediately after their MODELS 7 Workshop, UKOLN hosted a half-day seminar entitled “RDF: What is it all about?”. RDF, or Resource Description Framework, is one of the latest TLAs (Three Letter Acronyms) to emerge from the W3C (World Wide Web Consortium), and is of particular pertinence to the library and collection management communities as one of its intended applications is the interchange of catalogue or metadata.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>What Is RDF?</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/14/what-is/</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 1998 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/14/what-is/</guid>
      <description>What is RDF? It&amp;rsquo;s the Resource Description Framework. Does that help? No? RDF is the latest acronym to add to your list, one that is set to gain in significance in the future. At present though it is early days for RDF and little accessible information is available for the interested reader. This short summary will try to outline some key points regarding RDF and point to available further information. What is certain is that this summary will go out of date quickly, RDF is &amp;lsquo;work in progress&amp;rsquo; and is an area which is undergoing rapid development and change.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>Netskills Corner: NCSA Mosaic Web Browser</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/2/brian/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Mar 1996 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/2/brian/</guid>
      <description>The World Wide Web, as originally conceived by Tim Berners-Lee, was intended to provide a collaborative groupware system for the European particle physics community. Although Tim Berners-Lee&#39;s original browser for the NeXT system provided collaborative authoring capabilities, the mainstream browsers, such as Mosaic and Netscape, implemented a publishing model, with a small number of authors and large numbers of readers.
A number of software developers are currently working on collaborative authoring tools.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>The 4th WWW Conference in Boston</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/1/boston/</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 1996 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/1/boston/</guid>
      <description>This is an informal diary of two delegates who attended the big event for World Wide Web people, namely the 4th International WWW Conference. Debra Hiom, the SOSIG research officer and John Kirriemuir, the UKOLN Information Officer provide the dialogue. The good quality photographs were taken by Debra, on her expensive camera, while the not-so-good quality pictures were taken by John on a cheap and nasty disposable camera (7 dollars).</description>
    </item>
    
  </channel>
</rss>