<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Wcag on Ariadne</title>
    <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/buzz/wcag/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Wcag on Ariadne</description>
    <generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator>
    <language>en-gb</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Jul 2013 23:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    
	<atom:link href="http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/buzz/wcag/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    
    
    <item>
      <title>Editorial Introduction to Issue 71</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/71/editorial2/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jul 2013 23:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/71/editorial2/</guid>
      <description>As I depart this chair after the preparation of what I thought would be the last issue of Ariadne [1], I make no apology for the fact that I did my best to include as much material&amp;nbsp; to her ‘swan song’ as possible. With the instruction to produce only one more issue this year, I felt it was important to publish as much of the content in the pipeline as I could.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>Bring Your Own Policy: Why Accessibility Standards Need to Be Contextually Sensitive</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/71/kelly-et-al/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jul 2013 23:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/71/kelly-et-al/</guid>
      <description>Initiatives to enhance Web accessibility have previously focused on the development of guidelines which apply on a global basis. Legislation at national and international levels increasingly mandate conformance with such guidelines. However large scale surveys have demonstrated the failure of such approaches to produce any significant impact.
We review previous critiques of the limitations of such approaches and introduces a new scenario – content for people with learning disabilities – in order to illustrate the limitations of resource-based standards.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>&#39;Does He Take Sugar?&#39;: The Risks of Standardising Easy-to-read Language</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/70/kelly-et-al/</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/70/kelly-et-al/</guid>
      <description>The idea that if we could only improve how we communicate, there would be less misunderstanding among people is as old as the hills. Historically, this notion has been expressed through things like school reform, spelling reform, publication of communication manuals, etc. The most radical expression of the desire for better understanding is the invention of a whole new artificial language with the intention of providing a universal language for humanity.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>Editorial Introduction to Issue 70</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/70/editorial/</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/70/editorial/</guid>
      <description>Welcome to Issue 70 of Ariadne which is full to the brim with feature articles and a wide range of event reports and book reviews.
In Gold Open Access: Counting the Costs Theo Andrew explains the significance of the recent RCUK amendment to their Open Access policy requirements of researchers and the importance assumed by the cost of publishing the Gold Open Access route. Unsurprisingly, there is currently a great variability in such costs to research institutions, while, with few exceptions, publishers are as yet slow to impart what effect the move to charging for article processing will have on current institutional subscription costs.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>The Institutional Web Management Workshop (IWMW) 2012</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/69/iwmw-2012-rpt/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2012 23:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/69/iwmw-2012-rpt/</guid>
      <description>The 16th Institutional Web Management Workshop (IWMW 12) took place at the University of Edinburgh&#39;s Appleton Tower – a building with a stunning panoramic view over the volcanic city.&amp;nbsp; The event brought together 172 delegates and attracted an additional 165 viewers to the live video stream of the plenary sessions over the three days.
This year&#39;s theme focussed on embedding innovation, and the event featured a range of case studies and examples of embedded practice.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>Book Review: Access, Delivery, Performance - The Future of Libraries Without Walls</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/64/day-rvw/</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 23:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/64/day-rvw/</guid>
      <description>It is normal in some subject disciplines to publish volumes of edited papers in honour of a respected colleague, usually to mark a significant birthday or career change. The contributors to such Festschriften* are usually made up of former colleagues or pupils of the person being honoured. This volume celebrates the work of Professor Peter Brophy, the founder of the Centre for Research in Library and Information Management (CERLIM), which since 1998 has been based at the Manchester Metropolitan University.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>Accessibility Testing and Reporting With TAW3</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/46/lauke/</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2006 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/46/lauke/</guid>
      <description>When it comes to assessing a Web site&#39;s accessibility, any Web designer should know by now that simply running the mark-up though an automated testing tool is not enough. Automated tools are limited, purely testing for syntax, easily ascertained &#34;yes or no&#34; situations and a set of (sometimes quite arbitrary) heuristics, which are often based on an interpretation of accessibility guidelines on the part of the tool&#39;s developers.
Nonetheless, automated checkers are a useful tool in the arsenal of accessibility-conscious designers, provided that their results are checked for false positives/negatives [1] and backed up by the necessary manual checks, carried out by a knowledgeable human tester who is familiar with any potential access issues and how they manifest themselves in a Web site.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>Editorial Introduction to Issue 44: One Day We All Learn the Hard Way</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/44/editorial/</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2005 23:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/44/editorial/</guid>
      <description>Having opined elsewhere in this august organ that it would not be my policy to produce themed issues, I suppose I had better put my hand up at least to accumulating a majority of main articles which address the theme of accessibility from various and interesting perspectives. Having argued on the grounds that Ariadne issues which concentrate unduly on one topic inevitably leave a lot of readers feeling excluded, I can see that that the majority of readers who do not live with significant visual, physical or other impairments will feel hurt and almost certainly betrayed.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>Evaluating Web Sites for Accessibility With Firefox</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/44/lauke/</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2005 23:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/44/lauke/</guid>
      <description>In a previous issue of Ariadne [1], I gave a brief overview of Mozilla Firefox [2] and introduced a few of its most useful extensions. In this article, we will use one of these extensions, Chris Pederick&#39;s Web Developer toolbar [3], to aid us in a preliminary assessment of a web site&#39;s accessibility.
Although awareness of web accessibility has steadily increased in recent years, many web developers are still uncertain about how to evaluate their sites.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>Involving Users in the Development of a Web Accessibility Tool</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/44/craven/</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2005 23:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/44/craven/</guid>
      <description>The European Union (EU) is increasingly focused on design for all issues and ensuring that access to information and telecommunications meets the needs of all people in order to address the digital divide and create an information society for all. This includes the estimated 37 million people with disabilities in the EU, as well as other groups who could face barriers to e-inclusion such as older people and people with access limitations.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>Towards a Pragmatic Framework for Accessible E-Learning</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/44/phipps/</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2005 23:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/44/phipps/</guid>
      <description>From Well Meaning Guideline to Stealth StandardAccess to learning for all students is a value that is hard to dispute for anyone working in the education sector. Within the areas of education that are concerned with supporting disabled students, it has almost become dogma that in order to provide this &amp;lsquo;universal access&amp;rsquo; we must have standards in design that can accommodate all (disabled) learner needs. This view is supported by legislation:</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>Web Accessibility Revealed: The Museums, Libraries and Archives Council Audit</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/44/petrie-weisen/</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2005 23:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/44/petrie-weisen/</guid>
      <description>In 2004, the Museums, Libraries and Archives Council (MLA) commissioned a Web accessibility audit from City University London. MLA is the national development agency working for and on behalf of museums, libraries and archives in England and advising government on policy and priorities for the sector. The audit was inspired by a study conducted by City University London in 2003/2004 on the accessibility of 1,000 general Web sites for the Disability Rights Commission (DRC) [1].</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>Web Focus: The WWW 2005 Conference</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/44/web-focus/</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2005 23:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/44/web-focus/</guid>
      <description>About the WWW 2005 ConferenceThe WWW 2005 Conference was held in the Nippon Conference Centre in Chiba, Japan over 10-14 May 2005. This conference is the main event for the Web research community and provides an opportunity for researchers to present papers on research into developments in the Web infrastructure. In addition to its role for the research community, the conference also attracts delegates who are active in leading edge work in more mainstream areas.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>Developing and Publicising a Workable Accessibility Strategy</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/38/phipps/</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2004 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/38/phipps/</guid>
      <description>This article looks at the increasing need for developers of institutional and educational Web sites to develop and follow a strategy for ensuring optimal accessibility of online content. In particular the need is stressed for careful thought about the aims of such a strategy, and to ensure that the strategy meets a balance between ambition, legal responsibility and equitable access to learning and teaching. As an example, the need for a well written public online accessibility statement is discussed, not only as a demonstration of awareness and proactivity, but also as an important factor in its own right in optimising access.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>WebWatch: How Accessible Are Australian University Web Sites?</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/38/alexander/</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2004 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/38/alexander/</guid>
      <description>This article reports on a recent study of the accessibility of Australian university Web sites. A selection of key pages from all 45 Australian tertiary education Web sites were analysed to assess their compliance with basic accessibility standards, as required by Australian anti-discrimination legislation. The results&amp;ndash;98% of sites failed to comply&amp;ndash;suggest that Australian university Web sites are likely to present significant barriers to access for people with disabilities. Web accessibility is poorly understood by university Web publishers, and procedures are not in place to ensure that university Web sites provide equitable access to important online resources.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>Web Focus: WWW 2003 Trip Report</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/36/web-focus/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2003 23:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/36/web-focus/</guid>
      <description>WWW 2003 was the 12th in the series of international World Wide Web conferences organised by the IW3C2 (the International World Wide Web Conference Committee). The international WWW conferences provide an opportunity for the Web research community to describe their research activities. Other tracks at the conference cover areas such as cultural resources, e-learning, accessibility, etc. In addition W3C (the World Wide Web Consortium) gives a series of presentations which describe many of the new Web standards being developed.</description>
    </item>
    
  </channel>
</rss>