Paula Manning reports on feedback received on the BIOME Service and how the service will develop in response.
![]()
2. Searching
Requests for enhancements to the search functions included the ability to
search for more than one resource type (eg. mailing list) within the
advanced search page and to allow searching of specific fields of the
database. Relevance ranking of search results was also a requested
feature. It is our intention to implement all of these over the coming
year. We will also be reviewing our current list of resource types to
improve the range and display of the listing and include new resource
types such as 'images'.
3. Descriptions
The inclusion of descriptions of the key features of each resource was
considered useful. However, the length of descriptions was sometimes
considered too long, necessitating lots of scrolling to view large numbers
of resources in search results. Suggestions were to display the first line
only with a clickable button to view the full description or just a
display of the URL title and keywords with a button to view the
description. We will therefore investigate putting one of these solutions
in place.
4. Service structure
The concept behind the organisation of BIOME was to offer searching across
the entire life sciences subject field, but also offer focused searching
in specific subject areas within the life sciences. The structure of the
web service reflects this concept. The BIOME home page provides a search
box for the entire life sciences collection. The five gateways offer
searching of a specific subject area. For example, Vetgate offers
searching for only veterinary medicine and animal health resources.
Unfortunately this structure is not helping some users to search in the
appropriate place to find relevant resources. A brief investigation of the
search logs also illustrated this issue. We will therefore be providing
more navigational guides within the Service to emphasise the collection
scope of BIOME and its five gateways. As mentioned above, this will
include the display of some subject headings on the home pages.
The feedback we requested was not just confined to the public aspects of the Service. BIOME is provided by a consortium of partners whom all provide content using the database management system. We found that the separation of Internet resources by gateways is also proving an issue behind the scenes. Although a collection scope document exists for each of the gateways, there is an inevitable overlap in the subject fields. Currently Internet resources of relevance to more than one gateway community are entered twice, albeit with different thesauri and classification codes. Duplicates are then suppressed from the BIOME wide searches. To improve this, we are planning to re-design the structure of the system to integrate all records into one area. One record only will be created for a resource. This will then be assigned thesauri terms and classification marks from the relevant subject schemes so that it can be retrieved from different gateways.
5. Cross searching other collections
Requests for cross searching with other collections will soon begin to be
realised through our Portal Development Project. As I reported in the last
issue of Ariadne, we are taking part in the Resource Discovery Network
Subject Portals Development Project, involving the development of
proto-type portal services. Following the prototype and testing stage,
cross-searching will then be integrated into the main BIOME service. One
of the developements which has already taken place as part of this project
is that the BIOME collection is now searchable using Z39.50. If you would
like to access our Z39.50 service, please contact Bob Parkinson, Technical
Manager at rwp@biome.ac.uk.
We are always keen to hear views and suggestions on the service. If you
have any comments, please send them to Paula Manning, BIOME Service
Manager at the email address below.
| Paula Manning BIOME Service Manager University of Nottingham Email: pm@biome.ac.uk |