<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Clifford Chance on Ariadne</title>
    <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/organisations/clifford-chance/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Clifford Chance on Ariadne</description>
    <generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator>
    <language>en-gb</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2012 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    
	<atom:link href="http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/organisations/clifford-chance/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    
    
    <item>
      <title>Book Review: The Embedded Librarian</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/70/azzolini-rvw/</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/70/azzolini-rvw/</guid>
      <description>Librarianship as a profession is confronting a growing demand to prove its worth. Library patrons expect utility. The organisations that fund them pre-suppose a contribution to their bottom lines.
The calls for this proof come from librarians themselves as much as from their employers. And the tone of the questioning is persistent if not redundant. It can be distilled to a fundamental query: Can the library sustain its basic mission of effectively and efficiently fulfilling its users&#39; information needs given the technological, social, and economic developments that are transforming how people interact with data, documents, and each other?</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>Book Review: The Future of Archives and Recordkeeping</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/68/azzolini-rvw/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/68/azzolini-rvw/</guid>
      <description>Librarians, archivists, and records managers do not share identical challenges or controversies in their practical endeavours or theoretical queries. However, a common issue for all the information professions and a dominating topic of discussion in their literature is the fundamental change in the structure and distribution of knowledge caused by mass digitisation. The proliferation of daily digital content, in quantity, reach, and manifestation, is confronting them all with a disquieting role ambiguity.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>Book Review: Envisioning Future Academic Library Services</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/67/azzolini-rvw/</link>
      <pubDate>Sun, 03 Jul 2011 23:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/67/azzolini-rvw/</guid>
      <description>Since networked information technology has initiated a breathtaking transformation of knowledge practices, librarians have had a generous supply of thought leaders whose lifetime experience has permitted them to issue credible translations of the &#39;writing on the wall&#39;. Recently, however, there seems to be many more analysts (and soothsayers) and much more anxious observation and published interpretation of such writing. And the message comes in a red ink, in bold, and with distinct portent, when not downright ominous.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>John Azzolini</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/author/john-azzolini-author-profile/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/author/john-azzolini-author-profile/</guid>
      <description>John Azzolini has been working in private law firm libraries in New York City for over ten years. He began in technical services and cataloguing but later realised that the challenges of reference were too tempting to pass up. John is always interested in discovering new legal research content and methods as well as in the continuing possibilities of digital libraries.</description>
    </item>
    
  </channel>
</rss>