<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Ietf on Ariadne</title>
    <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/organisations/ietf/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Ietf on Ariadne</description>
    <generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator>
    <language>en-gb</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2010 23:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    
	<atom:link href="http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/organisations/ietf/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    
    
    <item>
      <title>What Is a URI and Why Does It Matter?</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/65/thompson-hs/</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2010 23:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/65/thompson-hs/</guid>
      <description>URI stands for Uniform Resource Identifier, the official name for those things you see all the time on the Web that begin &#39;http:&#39; or &#39;mailto:&#39;, for example http://www.w3.org/, which is the URI for the home page of the World Wide Web Consortium [1]. (These things were called URLs (Uniform Resource Locators) in the early days of the Web, and the change from URL to URI is either hugely significant or completely irrelevant, depending on who is talking—I have nothing to say about this issue in this article.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>Abstract Modelling of Digital Identifiers</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/62/nicholas-et-al/</link>
      <pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/62/nicholas-et-al/</guid>
      <description>Discussion of digital identifiers, and persistent identifiers in particular, has often been confused by differences in underlying assumptions and approaches. To bring more clarity to such discussions, the PILIN Project has devised an abstract model of identifiers and identifier services, which is presented here in summary. Given such an abstract model, it is possible to compare different identifier schemes, despite variations in terminology; and policies and strategies can be formulated for persistence without committing to particular systems.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>The Future of Interoperability and Standards in Education: A JISC CETIS Event</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/62/cetis-stds-2010-rpt/</link>
      <pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/62/cetis-stds-2010-rpt/</guid>
      <description>The stated intention of this working meeting organised by JISC CETIS, and held at the University of Bolton, UK, on 12 January 2010 was to:
&#39;[...] bring together participants in a range of standards organisations and communities to look at the future for interoperability standards in the education sector. The key topic for consideration is the relationship between specifications developed in informal communities and formal standards organisations and industry consortia. The meeting will also seek to explore the role of informal specification communities in rapidly developing, implementing and testing specifications in an open process before submission to more formal, possibly closed, standards bodies.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>Persistent Identifiers: Considering the Options</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/56/tonkin/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 23:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/56/tonkin/</guid>
      <description>What Is a Persistent Identifier, and Why?Persistent identifiers (PIs) are simply maintainable identifiers that allow us to refer to a digital object – a file or set of files, such as an e-print (article, paper or report), an image or an installation file for a piece of software. The only interesting persistent identifiers are also persistently actionable (that is, you can &amp;ldquo;click&amp;rdquo; them); however, unlike a simple hyperlink, persistent identifiers are supposed to continue to provide access to the resource, even when it moves to other servers or even to other organisations.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>The Networked Library Service Layer: Sharing Data for More Effective Management and Cooperation</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/56/gatenby/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 23:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/56/gatenby/</guid>
      <description>Libraries&amp;rsquo; collections fall into three parts: physical, digital and licensed. These are managed by multiple systems, ILS (Integrated Library System), ERM (Electronic Records Management), digital management, digital repositories, resolvers, inter-library loan and reference. At the same time libraries are increasingly co-operating in collecting and storing resources. This article examines how to identify data that is best located at global, collective and local levels. An example is explored, namely the benefits of moving data from different local systems to the network level to manage acquisition of the total collection as a whole and in combination with consortia members.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>The W3C Technical Architecture Group</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/51/thompson/</link>
      <pubDate>Sun, 29 Apr 2007 23:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/51/thompson/</guid>
      <description>Background: The W3C and Its Process The World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) was set up by Tim Berners-Lee in 1994 to preserve and enhance the public utility of the Web for everyone, to &amp;ldquo;lead the Web to its full potential&amp;rdquo;. It is a consortium of industrial and institutional members (around 450 at the time of writing) who pay on a sliding scale proportional to size. It produces Recommendations which are widely recognised as de facto standards.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>Joint Workshop on Future-proofing Institutional Websites</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/46/dcc-fpw-rpt/</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2006 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/46/dcc-fpw-rpt/</guid>
      <description>This DCC [1] and Wellcome Library [2] workshop sought to provide insight into ways that content creators and curators can ensure ongoing access to reliable Web sites over time. The issue is not merely one of archiving; it is also about designing and managing a Web site so that it is suitable for long-term preservation with minimum intervention by curators to ensure the content remains reliable and understandable through time.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>ERPANET Seminar on Persistent Identifiers</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/40/erpanet-ids-rpt/</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2004 23:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/40/erpanet-ids-rpt/</guid>
      <description>Day OneIntroductionWelcome and KeynoteOverview of Persistent Identifier initiativesURNOpenURL - The Rough GuideInfo URIsThe DCMI Persistent Identifier Working GroupThe CENDI ReportARKPURLsOverview of the Handle SystemDOIDay TwoIdentifiers at the Coal FaceEPICURThe National Digital Data Archive (NDA)NBN:URN Generator and ResolverDIVAThe Publisher&amp;rsquo;s PerspectiveDigital Object Identifiers for Publishing and the e-Learning CommunitiesPublication and Citation of Scientific and Primary DataInformation and the Government of CanadaConclusion
This event, organised by ERPANET [1], brought together around 40 key players with an interest in the topic of persistent identifiers in order to synthesize the current state of play, debate the issues and consider what lies on the horizon in this field of activity.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>ECDL-2003 Web Archiving</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/37/ecdl-web-archiving-rpt/</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2003 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/37/ecdl-web-archiving-rpt/</guid>
      <description>On 21 August 2003, the 3rd ECDL Workshop on Web Archives [1] [2] was held in Trondheim, Norway in association with the 7th European Conference on Digital Libraries (ECDL) [3]. This event was the third in a series of annual workshops that have been held in association with the ECDL conferences held in Darmstadt [4] and Rome [5]. These earlier workshops primarily focused on the activities of legal deposit libraries and the collection strategies and technologies being used by Web archiving initiatives [6].</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>Web Focus: A Standards-Based Culture for Web Site Development</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/35/web-focus/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2003 23:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/35/web-focus/</guid>
      <description>In Ariadne issue 33 the Web Focus column encouraged Web developers to &#34;get serious about HTML standards&#34; [1]. The article advocated use of XHTML and highlighted reasons why this was an important standard for Web developers.
XHTML is just one of the standards which has been developed by the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C). W3C has also developed several standards for XML as well as standards in the area of hyperlinking, multimedia and graphics.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>A Policy Context: eLib and the Emergence of the Subject Gateways</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/25/subject-gateways/</link>
      <pubDate>Sat, 23 Sep 2000 23:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/25/subject-gateways/</guid>
      <description>This brief paper outlines some of the features of the policy environment which led to the setting up of the influential &#39;subject gateways&#39; as part of the Electronic Libraries Programme. It has the modest and partial ambition of putting some of the discussions of the time on record. It should be read as a companion piece to two other articles. The first, Law 1994, develops the historical context for the emergence of the data centres, a central component of JISC information infrastructure, and collaterally discusses the broad thrust of JISC&#39;s developing informational activity.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>Metadata: Workshop in Luxembourg </title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/20/metadata/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jun 1999 23:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/20/metadata/</guid>
      <description>The Metadata Workshop held in Luxembourg on the 12 April was the third in an ongoing series of such meetings. The first Metadata Workshop was held in December 1997 and included a tutorial on metadata provided by UKOLN, some project presentations and break-out sessions on various metadata issues [1, 2]. The second workshop, held in June 1998, concentrated more on technical and strategic issues [3]. Around 50 people attended the third workshop, mostly drawn from organisations involved in European Union funded projects supplemented by a few Commission staff.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>What Is a URI?</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/18/what-is/</link>
      <pubDate>Sat, 19 Dec 1998 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/18/what-is/</guid>
      <description>Users of the Web are familiar with URLs, the Uniform Resource Locators. A URL is a locator for a network accessible resource. Such a locator can be considered an identifier for the resource that it refers to. Depending on the interpretation of identification, various different attributes of a resource could be considered as an identifier for that resource. However, what comprises a functional resource identifier depends upon the context in which that identifier will be used.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>Web Focus: Ways of Exploiting New Technologies</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/16/web-focus/</link>
      <pubDate>Sat, 18 Jul 1998 23:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/16/web-focus/</guid>
      <description>Since February 1998 HTML 4.0 [1], CSS 2.0[2], the Mathematical Markup Language MathML [3] and the Extensible Markup Language XML [4] have all become W3C Recommendations. These web protocols, all of which are concerned with the way in which information can be represented and displayed, were initially Working Drafts which were developed by the appropriate W3C Working Group. The Working Drafts were then made publicly available as W3C Proposed Recommendations. Following a review period the Proposed Recommendations were voted on by W3C member organisations.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>Internationalisation and the Web</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/9/trenches/</link>
      <pubDate>Sun, 18 May 1997 23:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/9/trenches/</guid>
      <description>The World Wide Web is intended to be &amp;ldquo;an embodiment of human knowledge&amp;rdquo; [1] but is currently mainly an embodiment of only West European and North American knowledge resources. The reason for this is simple; despite the name, the development of the World Wide Web has until recently been very heavily oriented towards English and other Western European languages[2]. If you want to display a resource with an ideographic character sets from Asian languages for example then you have been forced to either use inlined images or localized, kludged versions of software.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>Introducing Web Focus</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/8/web-focus/</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 1997 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/8/web-focus/</guid>
      <description>I first saw the Web in December 1992 at a meeting of the Information Exchange Special Interest Group at Leeds University. At that time, as Information Officer in the Computing Service, I was looking for software which could be used to develop a Campus Wide Information System (CWIS). Quite a number of institutions in the UK were running CWISes, mainly based on home-grown software, but some were beginning to make use of Internet tools, such as Gopher.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>Making a MARC With Dublin Core</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/8/marc/</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 1997 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/8/marc/</guid>
      <description>In the last issue of Ariadne the basic layout of the MAchine Readable Catalogue (MARC) records [1] used by most library systems worldwide was introduced. The article also described the first release of a Perl module that can be used for processing MARC records. Since that article was published, a number of people have been in touch saying that they either were developing similar in-house MARC processing software or were planning on developing something similar for public usage themselves.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>Unique Identifiers in a Digital World</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/8/unique-identifiers/</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 1997 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/8/unique-identifiers/</guid>
      <description>On the afternoon of Friday the 14 March more than 50 people involved in electronic publishing met for a seminar reviewing recent developments in the unique identification of digital objects. Delegates included representatives of publishers, libraries and other organisations. The seminar was organised jointly by Book Industry Communication (BIC) and the UK Office for Library and Information Networking (UKOLN) with support from the eLib programme. A brief report follows:
Introduction - Why we need identifiersBrian Green (BIC) and Mark Bide (Mark Bide and Associates) introduced the seminar with an overview of why the publishing industry needs identifiers [1].</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>MCF: Will Dublin Form the Apple Core</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/7/mcf/</link>
      <pubDate>Sun, 19 Jan 1997 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/7/mcf/</guid>
      <description>For many years librarians and computer scientists have been researching and developing metadata standards and technology. Although library OPACs are obviously commercially viable systems for maintaining metadata about hard copy resources, they are something of a niche market still. With the explosion in information provision on the Internet, this niche metadata market is set to explode itself, as an increasing number of companies develop a commercial interest in the provision and support for indexing, cataloging and navigating Internet resources.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>Netskills Corner: Fifth WWW Conference, Paris</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/3/netskills_corner/</link>
      <pubDate>Sat, 18 May 1996 23:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/3/netskills_corner/</guid>
      <description>About the Conference
The CNIT
The fifth World Wide Web conference was held at CNIT, La Défense in Paris from 6-10th May 1996. The conference began with a day of tutorials and workshops and concluded with a developer&amp;rsquo;s day. The technical programme took place on the 7-9th May. In addition a Small to Medium Enterprises (SME) Forum was held on 9-10th May.
ImpressionsThe WWW conference has certainly changed since the first conference was held at CERN in May 1994.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>Wire: Email Interview with Chris Lilley</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/2/wire/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Mar 1996 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/2/wire/</guid>
      <description>I represent JISC at the Advisory Council meetings of the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C). Most of the delegates are representing commercial companies, wheras I am effectively representing the UK Higher Education sector! W3C member companies are given advance information in confidence, and I am currently working with W3C to see how I can involve UK HE in the work of W3C without violating that confidence. This position is funded through the Advisory Group on Computer Graphics (AGOCG) and covers 25% of my time.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>From the Trenches: HTML, Which Version?</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/1/knight/</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 1996 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/1/knight/</guid>
      <description>Most people concerned with Electronic Libraries have by now marked up a document in the HyperText Markup Language (HTML), even if its only their home page. HTML provides an easy means of adding functionality such as distributed hyperlinking and insertion of multimedia objects into documents. Done well, HTML provides access to information over a wide variety of platforms using many different browsers accessing servers via all manners of network connections. However, it is also possible to do HTML badly.</description>
    </item>
    
  </channel>
</rss>