<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>University of Leicester on Ariadne</title>
    <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/organisations/university-of-leicester/</link>
    <description>Recent content in University of Leicester on Ariadne</description>
    <generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator>
    <language>en-gb</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Jul 2013 23:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    
	<atom:link href="http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/organisations/university-of-leicester/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    
    
    <item>
      <title>Book Review: University Libraries and Space in the Digital World</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/71/murphy-rvw/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jul 2013 23:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/71/murphy-rvw/</guid>
      <description>Despite the economic adversity faced by many academic bodies and their libraries, there are still some institutions lucky enough to be in a position to refurbish, extend or commission a new building. University Libraries and Space in the Digital World is undoubtedly for the many people involved in such projects, but is quite clearly designed for a wider readership too. This is a good thing, as it would be hard to think of a library user or staff member who is not affected by the issue of library space.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>KAPTUR the Highlights:  Exploring Research Data Management in the Visual Arts</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/71/garrett-et-al/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jul 2013 23:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/71/garrett-et-al/</guid>
      <description>KAPTUR (2011-13) [1], funded by Jisc and led by the Visual Arts Data Service, was a collaborative project involving four institutional partners: the Glasgow School of Arts; Goldsmiths, University of London; University for the Creative Arts; and the University of the Arts London.&amp;nbsp;Research data have in recent years become regarded as a valuable institutional resource and their appropriate collection, curation, publication and preservation as essential. This has been driven by a number of internal and external forces, and all UK Research Councils now require it as a condition of funding [2].</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>eMargin: A Collaborative Textual Annotation Tool</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/71/kehoe-gee/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jul 2013 23:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/71/kehoe-gee/</guid>
      <description>In the Research and Development Unit for English Studies (RDUES) at Birmingham City University, our main research field is Corpus Linguistics: the compilation and analysis of large text collections in order to extract new knowledge about language. We have previously developed the WebCorp [1] suite of software tools, designed to extract language examples from the Web and to uncover frequent and changing usage patterns automatically. eMargin, with its emphasis on manual annotation and analysis, was therefore somewhat of a departure for us.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>Eduserv Symposium 2012: Big Data, Big Deal?</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/69/eduserv-2012-rpt/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2012 23:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/69/eduserv-2012-rpt/</guid>
      <description>The annual Eduserv Symposium [1] was billed as a ‘must-attend event for IT professionals in Higher Education’; the choice of topical subject matter being one of the biggest crowd-drawers (the other being the amazing venue: the Royal College of Physicians). The past few years have seen coverage of highly topical areas such as virtualisation and the cloud, the mobile university and access management. This year’s theme of big data is certainly stimulating interest, but what exactly are the implications for those working in research, learning, and operations in Higher Education?</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>DataCite UK User Group Meeting</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/67/datacite-2011-rpt/</link>
      <pubDate>Sun, 03 Jul 2011 23:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/67/datacite-2011-rpt/</guid>
      <description>DataCite [1] is an international not-for-profit organisation dedicated to making research data a normal, citable part of the scientific record. It is made up of a membership of 15 major libraries and data centres, which, along with four associate members, represent 11 different countries across four continents. The approach taken by DataCite currently centres on assigning Digital Object Identifiers (DOIs) to datasets; it is a member of the International DOI Foundation and one of a handful of DOI registration agencies.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>Book Review: Digital Consumers - Reshaping the Information Professions</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/60/rafiq-rvw/</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 23:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/60/rafiq-rvw/</guid>
      <description>This book is a collection of articles by the members of the Centre for Information Behaviour and the Evaluation of Research (CIBER), at University College London (UCL) and associates, such as Dr Tom Dobrowolski of Warsaw University, Professor Michael Moss of the University of Glasgow, Professor Barrie Gunter of the University of Leicester. The book is a result of the exploration of the impact of the digital world on publishing, libraries and information consumers for the past eight years and addresses widespread concerns being felt by information professionals including librarians, publishers, journalists, and archivists.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>The 2008 Mashed Museum Day and UK Museums on the Web Conference</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/56/ukmw08-rpt/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 23:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/56/ukmw08-rpt/</guid>
      <description>Following the success of the inaugural event last year [1], the Mashed Museum day was again held the day before the Museums Computer Group UK Museums on the Web Conference. The theme of the conference was &#39;connecting collections online&#39;, and the Mashed Museum day was a chance for museum ICT staff to put this into practice.
The Mashed Museum DayEarlier this year I received an email that read:
You are invited to a day of coding, thinking and idea sharing with a select group of museum colleagues.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>24 Hour Museum: From Past to Future</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/52/pratty/</link>
      <pubDate>Sun, 29 Jul 2007 23:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/52/pratty/</guid>
      <description>24 Hour Museum [1] is a successful and sustainable cultural Web site. Type the word &#39;museum&#39; into Google UK and up it pops as a top five search result. Unlike the other top sites, all national museums or galleries, 24HM&#39;s remit covers the whole country, in eclectic subject areas, reaching a wide variety of audiences with simple and accessible content.
In 2006 24HM reached ten million visits in the year. 2007 sees the site reaching a million visitors a month, from home to office, schoolroom to museum.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>Eduserv Foundation Symposium 2007: Virtual Worlds, Real Learning?</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/52/eduserv-rpt/</link>
      <pubDate>Sun, 29 Jul 2007 23:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/52/eduserv-rpt/</guid>
      <description>I was pleased this year to accept a place as a delegate at the Eduserv Foundation Symposium, which was held at Congress House, London on 10 May 2007. The Symposium was primarily concerned with Second Life and its relevance and applicability to learning. Second Life is a &amp;lsquo;virtual-world&amp;rsquo; created and commercially operated by a company called Linden Lab. It has gained a significant amount of media coverage in recent months.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>The Second Digital Repositories Programme Meeting</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/47/jisc-repositories-rpt/</link>
      <pubDate>Sat, 29 Apr 2006 23:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/47/jisc-repositories-rpt/</guid>
      <description>The JISC (Joint Information Systems Committee) Digital Repositories Programme [1] held its second Programme meeting towards the end of March. Following in the collaborative tradition set by last October&#39;s joint Programme meeting with the Digital Preservation and Asset Management Programme [2], this gathering was themed around the cluster groups established by the Digital Repositories Programme [3] and included many guests from other JISC areas of work and beyond. These clusters seek to encompass many of the diverse issues being considered across the Digital Repositories Programme, including the different repository types (e-Learning and Scientific data), the infrastructural and technical issues (Integrating infrastructure and Machine services) and the social, cultural and legal topics (Legal and policy, Personal resource management strategies and Preservation).</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>Web Accessibility Revealed: The Museums, Libraries and Archives Council Audit</title>
      <link>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/44/petrie-weisen/</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2005 23:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/44/petrie-weisen/</guid>
      <description>In 2004, the Museums, Libraries and Archives Council (MLA) commissioned a Web accessibility audit from City University London. MLA is the national development agency working for and on behalf of museums, libraries and archives in England and advising government on policy and priorities for the sector. The audit was inspired by a study conducted by City University London in 2003/2004 on the accessibility of 1,000 general Web sites for the Disability Rights Commission (DRC) [1].</description>
    </item>
    
  </channel>
</rss>