Skip to Content

Overview of content related to 'web2rights'

Syndicate content

This page provides an overview of 2 articles related to 'web2rights', listing most recently updated content first. Note that filters may be applied to display a sub-set of articles in this category (see FAQs on filtering for usage tips). Select this link to remove all filters.

 'Inspecting article' image: copyright, used under license from
A project looking at the IPR issues around web 2.0 tools Project start date: 2007-10-01. Project end date: 2008-07-26. (Excerpt from this source)

Key statistics

Metadata related to 'web2rights' (as derived from all content tagged with this term):

  • Number of articles referring to 'web2rights': 2 (0.1% of published articles)
  • Total references to 'web2rights' across all Ariadne articles: 3
  • Average number of references to 'web2rights' per Ariadne article: 1.50
  • Earliest Ariadne article referring to 'web2rights': 2010-01
  • Trending factor of 'web2rights': 0 (see FAQs on monitoring of trends)

See our 'web2rights' overview for more data and comparisons with other tags. For visualisations of metadata related to timelines, bands of recency, top authors, and and overall distribution of authors using this term, see our 'web2rights' usage charts. Usage chart icon

Top authors

Ariadne contributors most frequently referring to 'web2rights':

  1. charles oppenheim (see articles on this topic by this author)
  2. marie-therese gramstadt (see articles on this topic by this author)

Note: Links to all articles by authors listed above set filters to display articles by each author in the overview below. Select this link to remove all filters.

Title Article summary Date

Kultivating Kultur: Increasing Arts Research Deposit

Marie-Therese Gramstadt discusses how the JISC-funded Kultivate Project is encouraging arts research deposit in UK institutional repositories.

March 2012, issue68, feature article

Book Review: Copyright - Interpreting the Law for Libraries, Archives and Information Services

Charles Oppenheim sees much to like in the new edition of this work by a well-known authority but identifies one potentially major drawback.

January 2010, issue62, review

Syndicate content

by Dr. Radut