Technology for Design: Cognitive Mismatches and Their Implications for Good Practice

  • Eddie Norman Loughborough University, IDATER

Abstract

This paper begins by noting some background issues concerning the linking of science and design and technological activities. Some theoretical difficulties in expressing ideas about design and technology are noted and the consequential merits of an empirical approach are exposed. Research findings are presented which help to support the development of a theoretical position in relation to technology for design, in particular introducing the notion of 'cognitive mismatches'. The evidence presented suggests that whe";;-esignificant cognitive mismatches exist between the matters which the designer must resolve (e.g. some are qualitative and modelled visually and some are quantitative and modelled mathematically), then focused practical tasks are essential in order to ensure high quality design outcomes. An invitation is included to participate in a broadly-based research programme in order to document good practice in relation to technology for design and explore associated issues.

Author Biography

Eddie Norman, Loughborough University, IDATER

Senior Lecturer, Department of Design and Technology

Co-Director of the International Conference on Design and Technology Educational Research and Curriculum Development

How to Cite
NORMAN, Eddie. Technology for Design: Cognitive Mismatches and Their Implications for Good Practice. Journal of Design & Technology Education, [S.l.], v. 4, n. 1, july 2009. ISSN 1360-1431. Available at: <https://www.ariadne.ac.uk/JDTE/article/view/406>. Date accessed: 24 sep. 2022.
Section
Research